QFT Commutator for spacelike separation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evaluation of the commutator of scalar field operators, specifically $$[\hat \phi(x), \hat \phi(y)]$$, under spacelike separation. The integral representation simplifies to $$[\hat \phi(0), \hat \phi(y)]$$, which is evaluated using the invariance of the integral $$\int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^{3}(2E_p)}(\exp(ip.y) - \exp(-ip.y))$$. The key conclusion is that the commutator vanishes for spacelike vectors due to Lorentz invariance, allowing the choice of coordinates where the vectors are simultaneous, thus eliminating the zeroth component of the inner product.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT) concepts
  • Familiarity with scalar field operators
  • Knowledge of Lorentz invariance in physics
  • Proficiency in evaluating integrals in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of scalar field operators in quantum field theory
  • Learn about Lorentz invariance and its implications in QFT
  • Explore the mathematical techniques for evaluating integrals in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the significance of spacelike and timelike separations in quantum fields
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum field theory, and researchers focusing on the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
29,471
Reaction score
21,215
Homework Statement
Show that the commutator for field operators is zero for spacelike separations
Relevant Equations
$$\hat \phi(x) = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^{3/2}(2E_p)^{1/2}}(\hat{a}_{\vec p}exp(-ip\cdot x)+\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{\vec p}exp(ip\cdot x))$$
I got as far as:
$$[\hat \phi(x), \hat \phi(y) ] = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^{3}(2E_p)}(\exp(-ip.(x-y) - \exp(-ip.(y-x))$$
Then I simplified the problem by taking one of the four-vectors to be the origin:
$$[\hat \phi(0), \hat \phi(y) ] = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^{3}(2E_p)}(\exp(ip.y) - \exp(-ip.y))$$
We need to show that this is zero for spacelike ##y##. But, I can't see how the spacelike condition is relevant. The hint in the book is that we can change ##-y## to ##y## in the second term. If ##p## was a three-vector I can see this, but the zeroth component of ##p## is the positive ##E_p##. And, if it's a simple ##p## substitution, then that should work for any ##y##, spacelike or otherwise.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM
Physics news on Phys.org
I might have a solution. Assuming this whole theory is Lorentz invariant, then we could choose coordinates so that ##x## and ##y## are simultaneous. The zeroth term disappears from the inner product and the result follows.

I guess that's the trick.
 
Hint: You don't have to assume that the theory is Lorentz invariant, because the integral for sure is, because ##\mathrm{d}^3 p/E_p## is invariant, and ##y \cdot p## is too. That's why the integral is a scalar field operator. Now you can choose ##y## (given that it is space) in the most simple way to evaluate this function. Note that since you only have the four-vector ##y## available it's clear that the expression must be a function of ##y^2=y \cdot y## only!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
738
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
12K