QM - Can We Conclude [A,B]=0 with {|a',b'>}?

  • Thread starter Thread starter indigojoker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    observables Qm
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 3K views
indigojoker
Messages
240
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If A and B were observables, and say the simultaneous eigenkets of A and B [tex]{|a',b'>}[/tex] form a complete orthonormal set of base ket. Can we conclude that [tex][A,B]=0[/tex]?

2. The attempt at a solution

Assume [tex]{|a',b'>}[/tex] is incompatible:

[tex]AB|a',b'>=a'b'|a',b'>[/tex] <-- skipped several steps
[tex]BA|a',b'>=a'b'|a',b'>[/tex]

[tex]AB|a',b'>-BA|a',b'>=0[/tex]
[tex][AB-BA]|a',b'>=0[/tex]
[tex][A,B]|a',b'>=0[/tex]
[tex][A,B]=0[/tex]

and so we reach a contradiction. Therefore, we conclude that [tex][A,B]=0[/tex] assuming the simultaneous eigenkets of A and B [tex]{|a',b'>}[/tex] form a complete orthonormal set of base ket.

was this thought process correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
indigojoker said:
[tex][A,B] |a',b'\rangle =0[/tex]...(1)
[tex][A,B]=0[/tex].....(2)

It is important to mention that vectors [itex]|a',b' \rangle[/itex] form a full basis. Therefore any vector in the Hilbert space can be represented as a linear combination of these basis vectors. Therefore, by linearity, your eq. (1) is valid for any vector [itex]|\psi \rangle[/itex]

[tex][A,B] |\psi \rangle =0[/tex]

Then you can conclude that eq. (2) holds.

Eugene.
 
dextercioby said:
Yes, but the observables are incompatible, not the vectors. And your LaTex would look better by using "[tex]\rangle[/tex]" instead of ">".

Sorry, you mean I should assume that A and B are incompatible and the do the proof by contradiction right?
 
indigojoker said:
Sorry, you mean I should assume that A and B are incompatible and the do the proof by contradiction right?

Nope, compatibility of the observables is no issue here. And you don't need to use any "proof by contradiction". A direct proof is enough. And that's what you did in post #1 in this thread.
 
Then I'm not sure what you mean by this:
dextercioby said:
Yes, but the observables are incompatible, not the vectors.
 
just wonder, how would this change if [tex]|a' , b' \rangle[/tex] did not form a complete orthonormal set of base ket