QM: Does $\frac{d\psi}{dx} \rightarrow 0$ at ±infinity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of the wave function's derivative, specifically whether \(\frac{d\psi}{dx} \rightarrow 0\) at ±infinity. It is established that for a wave function to be normalizable, \(\psi\) must approach zero at ±infinity, but this does not necessarily imply that its derivative also approaches zero. A counterexample provided is \(\psi(x) = A(x)\sin(x/A(x))\) with \(A(x) = e^{-x}\), which demonstrates that while \(\psi\) goes to zero, its derivative does not. The conversation also touches on the requirement for \(\psi\) to decrease faster than any power of \(x\) to ensure valid calculations of expectation values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of normalizability conditions for wave functions
  • Familiarity with derivatives and their implications in quantum mechanics
  • Concept of expectation values in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of normalizable wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Study the implications of derivatives of wave functions on physical observables
  • Learn about the mathematical conditions for wave functions at infinity
  • Explore the concept of expectation values and their calculations in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of wave functions and their implications in quantum theory.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Is it always true that

\frac{d\psi}{dx} \rightarrow 0

(at ±infinity)? And if so, why?

I know that for a wave function to be normalizable, we must have psi-->0 at ±infinity but as far as i can see, that does not imply that the derivative will be 0. A counter-exemple of this is a decreasing "sine-like" function with an oscillation frequency inversely proportional to its amplitude. For instance

\psi(x) = A(x)sin(x/A(x))

for x>=0, and

\psi(x) = \psi(-x)

for x<0., with

A(x) = e^{-x}

This function goes to zero at ±infinity but it's derivative is wild at ±infinity.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is your example even normalizable? Anyway one intuitive way of looking at this is that since infinity isn't really a well defined position i.e. inf+1 is still inf so the derivative must be zero at inf. This is a mathematical abomination though.
 
Thx inha. I'd forgotten that my counter example had to be normalizable to be valid. Maybe there is a way to show that for psi normalizable, the derivative go to zero, thus getting rid of the abomination.

And another question of the same type: what is the reason that psi must go to zero at infinity faster than any power of x?

Is this also true of d\psi/dx? If so, I also ask why.

Thx!
 
The only reason I can think of right now is that Psi has to go to zero faster than any power of x goes to infinity is so that expectation values of x. Since the wave function has no physical meaning by itself, there is the obvious requirement that it be a function such that it is possible to perform on it the operations that result in useful physical information.

The derivatives of Psi must go to zero at infinity to calculate expectation values of momentum. Although the derivatives don't need to go to zero faster than any power of x goes to infinity for <p> calculations, it may still be true.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K