QM: time evolution in an infinite well

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving for eigenfunctions in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically within an infinite potential well. The participants reference the Hamiltonian operator and the eigenvalue equation H|ψ⟩ = E_n|ψ⟩. The solution for the first wavefunction, ψ_1, is approached through coefficient comparison with known eigenfunctions, while the second wavefunction, ψ_2, presents challenges that participants suggest can be addressed using Fourier series to derive a sum of sine functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly the Hamiltonian operator.
  • Familiarity with bra-ket notation and normalization of wavefunctions.
  • Knowledge of eigenvalue equations in quantum systems.
  • Experience with Fourier series and their application in solving differential equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of eigenfunctions in quantum mechanics using the infinite potential well model.
  • Learn about normalization techniques for quantum wavefunctions.
  • Explore the application of Fourier series in solving Schrödinger equations.
  • Investigate the observable postulate in quantum mechanics and its implications for Hamiltonian eigenfunctions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying wavefunctions and eigenvalue problems in infinite potential wells.

liorda
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img379.imageshack.us/img379/1864/screenshothw4pdfapplicamd7.png

Homework Equations


[tex]H|\psi > = E_n |\psi >[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


About part 1 of the question: I can find the eigenfunctions of psi_1 by comparing coefficients with the well known eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian in an infinite well, using trigonometric identities, but is there any simple way to find the eigenfunctions of psi_2, without actually solving the Schrödinger equation?

Thanks :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
How, exactly, did you solve for psi_1? Did you normalize?

I assume that since you used it, you're familiar with bra-ket notation, so just do [itex]\langle \psi_1 | \psi_1 \rangle=1[/itex] and similar for the second wavefunction.

I'm a little confused by the "Hamiltonian eigenfunction" saying, but I think all it means is that the observable postulate holds true and no kind of perturbation is necessary.
 
Hi Mindscrape, thanks for answering.

I didn't normalize psi_1, because the expression is a superposition of two eigenstates of a particle in a infinite box (it's just a sum of two sines). I compared the coefficients of [tex]sin(a) cos(b) = \frac{1}{2} \left[ sin(a+b)+sin(a-b)\right][/tex] to the well known coefficient sqrt(2/L) for particle in a box.

as for psi_2, the main problem is to find out what are the eigenfunctions. I didn't find any way other than using Fourier series for the polynomial expression and getting a sum of sines...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K