Quadratic drag — a baseball is thrown upwards

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the dynamics of a baseball thrown upwards, specifically analyzing the effects of quadratic drag on its motion. The forces acting on the baseball include gravitational force and fluid resistance, represented by the equations m dv/dt = -mg - cv^2 during ascent and m dv/dt = mg - cv^2 during descent. The participant clarifies misconceptions regarding the normal force, confirming that only gravitational and drag forces are relevant in this context. The correct approach involves integrating the equations of motion to derive the relationship between speed and height.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Familiarity with quadratic drag force equations
  • Basic calculus for integration
  • Knowledge of kinematics in vertical motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of motion equations under quadratic drag
  • Learn about integrating differential equations in physics
  • Explore the concept of terminal velocity in fluid dynamics
  • Investigate the effects of varying drag coefficients on projectile motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the mechanics of projectile motion and fluid dynamics, particularly in understanding the impact of air resistance on moving objects.

jbeatphys
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
A baseball of mass m is thrown straight up with an initial velocity v0. Assuming that the air drag on the ball varies quadratically with speed (f = cv^2), show that the speed varies with height according to the equations.

[Attached]
Screen Shot 2015-09-24 at 1.48.52 pm.png


Where x_{0} is the highest point and k = c/m. Note: x is measured positive upward, and the gravitational force is assumed to be constant.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



As I see it, F_netup = F(v_intial) - normal force - drag force(-v) & F_netdown = normal force - drag force.

F_up
(1) Integrate to v(t) (from v0 to 0) and then set v(0) and solve for t, which is the time that it takes to get the peak of the throw.
(2) Integrate to x(t) (from 0 to x0) and then sub in t_{peak}, and solve for v^2.

This is what I have in my head. But I when I complete these calculations I get nothing like what I should be getting [according to the equations] — I get a very complicated equation with hyperbolic trig functions.

Thanks for any help that you can provide.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unfortunately, we can't peek inside your head. You'll have to show your work.
 
SteamKing said:
Unfortunately, we can't peek inside your head. You'll have to show your work.

Okay, I can understand that, not a problem (and probably fortunately).
 
What are the (two) forces acting on the ball when it is rising? What does F_(v initial) mean? A normal force is usually considered a contact force. Is anything contacting the ball as it rises?

Chet
 
Oops. Yes. There is nothing in contact with the ball (other than the fluid, which is air) and so there is no normal force. I meant to say gravitational force, sorry.

The two forces acting upon the ball whilst it rises are the gravitational and the fluid resistance, which are both opposing the initial velocity. You are right to question what is the F_(v initial) it is definitely the wrong conceptualisation of the problem.

To reiterate:

m dv/dt = -mg-cv^2 (up) &
m dv/dt = mg-cv^2 (down) ... I am pretty sure now.

I am going through my calculations again at the moment.
 
jbeatphys said:
Oops. Yes. There is nothing in contact with the ball (other than the fluid, which is air) and so there is no normal force. I meant to say gravitational force, sorry.

The two forces acting upon the ball whilst it rises are the gravitational and the fluid resistance, which are both opposing the initial velocity. You are right to question what is the F_(v initial) it is definitely the wrong conceptualisation of the problem.

To reiterate:

m dv/dt = -mg-cv^2 (up) &
m dv/dt = mg-cv^2 (down) ... I am pretty sure now.

I am going through my calculations again at the moment.
And thanks for correcting my misconceptions.
 
jbeatphys said:
Oops. Yes. There is nothing in contact with the ball (other than the fluid, which is air) and so there is no normal force. I meant to say gravitational force, sorry.

The two forces acting upon the ball whilst it rises are the gravitational and the fluid resistance, which are both opposing the initial velocity. You are right to question what is the F_(v initial) it is definitely the wrong conceptualisation of the problem.

To reiterate:

m dv/dt = -mg-cv^2 (up) &
m dv/dt = mg-cv^2 (down) ... I am pretty sure now.

I am going through my calculations again at the moment.
Much better. Nice job.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K