Quadroceptological, and quadraceptological

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chi Meson
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the newly coined word "quadroceptological," with an alternative spelling "quadraceptological." The creator's daughter, Nell, is credited with its invention, and there is ongoing debate about which spelling should be considered valid. The word's meaning is described as both obvious and unimportant, and the creator invites interest from the National Spelling Bee for rights to the term. Participants engage in a broader conversation about the fluidity of the English language, referencing ancient Indo-European linguistic structures, particularly thematic vowels in Latin and Greek, to argue the correctness of the spelling. The dialogue also touches on the nature of language evolution and the legitimacy of invented words, with some humor and playful banter throughout.
Chi Meson
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,890
Reaction score
11
Let it be known that my daughter, Nell, made this word up.

It has two spellings, quadroceptological, and quadraceptological. The authorities are now disputing the issue, and the form that is deemed to be spurious will be discarded. Nevertheless, when you google quadroceptological OR quadraceptological, you will now be forwarded to this thread.

The meaning is both obvious and unimportant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If anyone from the National Spelling Bee would like to buy rights to this word, contact me.

Otherwise, feel free to use this cromulent word.
 


Chi Meson said:
The meaning is both obvious and unimportant.
This is a squigiferous comment and I think you are being stermitaceously croliscient.
 


I thought official language of the PF is English.
 


Borek said:
I thought official language of the PF is English.
English is a very fluid, rapidly-evolving, lemnolent language.
 


I think body building is quadrocept-illogical.
 


Borek said:
I thought official language of the PF is English.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFB_FS9rV0c
The word English covers a wide range of sins.
 


I find this entire thread execramonious and verboffusive.
 
The authorities are now disputing the issue,
Are they?
And who are they?
What possible dispute could they find?




curious minds need to know.
and require references to ... other people that are authorities.

lol j/k
 
  • #10
It's quadroceptological, and let me explain why.

Ancient Indo-European languages (such as Latin and Greek) have something called the thematic vowel, which is used to glue stems together, and in Proto-Indo-European, the value of the thematic vowel is either [e] or [o]. Thus, because [a] is not one of these values, it would leave only quadroceptological.
 
  • #11
Chi Meson said:
[...] both obvious and unimportant.

I have a question regarding this word's use that fits this description.
 
  • #12
TMO said:
It's quadroceptological, and let me explain why.

Ancient Indo-European languages (such as Latin and Greek) have something called the thematic vowel, which is used to glue stems together, and in Proto-Indo-European, the value of the thematic vowel is either [e] or [o]. Thus, because [a] is not one of these values, it would leave only quadroceptological.
How does quadruped fit into that?
 
  • #13
Look up "splenetic", I made that word.
 
  • #14
There's one mistake I made in my original post: the Greek thematic vowel is [o], but in Latin it's , so the correct classical compound would be quadriceptological.

Jimmy Snyder said:
How does quadruped fit into that?

Quadruped comes from the Latin quadrupes, which is a variant of quadripes, which is the correct Latin compound of quadr + pes. Sometimes languages have multiple variants of a word, and English, due to chance, picked an irregular variant.

phion said:
Look up "splenetic", I made that word.

The word "splenetic" comes from the Late Latin spleneticus, so it's highly unlikely (nevermind that we have an English document using "splenetic" which is from 1876, and one that uses "splenetik" which is from 1678).
 
Last edited:
  • #15
This thread wouldn't be complete without this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOSYiT2iG08

To address to the topic, it should be quadraceptological.

Upon further consideration, I've changed my mind.
 
  • #16
TMO said:
Ancient Indo-European languages (such as Latin and Greek) have something called the thematic vowel, which is used to glue stems together, and in Proto-Indo-European, the value of the thematic vowel is either [e] or [o]..

TMO said:
the Greek thematic vowel is [o], but in Latin it's .

But aren't Greek and Latin both Indo-European languages?
 

Similar threads

Replies
67
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top