Quadrupole Potential: Help Derive and Decipher This Beast

  • Thread starter Thread starter UAR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the quadrupole potential equation and its relationship to the dipole potential. The equation involves the dipole moment \textbf{p} and a term \textbf{q}, which is speculated to be the quadrupole moment tensor. The derivation is achieved by applying the dipole potential equation twice, leading to a more complex expression. Participants express curiosity about the nature of the quadrupole moment tensor and its physical significance. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding the mathematical derivation and the role of the quadrupole moment in potential equations.
UAR
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
(\textbf{q}\bullet\nabla)(\textbf{p}\bullet\nabla)\frac{1}{r} = -(\textbf{p}\bullet\textbf{q})\frac{1}{r^{3}} + 3(\textbf{p}\bullet\textbf{r})(\textbf{q}\bullet\textbf{r})\frac{1}{r^{5}}

r is distance between field point and dipole source, \textbf{p} is dipole moment, and I believe \textbf{q} may be quadrupole moment tensor (what is that anyways?),

How is the above equation derived ? and exactly how is it related to the more physically and mathematically lucid dipole potential below:

(\textbf{p}\bullet\nabla)\frac{1}{r} = -(\textbf{p}\bullet\textbf{r})\frac{1}{r^{3}}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi UAR! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(use \cdot instead of \bullet :wink:)
UAR said:
(\textbf{q}\bullet\nabla)(\textbf{p}\bullet\nabla)\frac{1}{r} = -(\textbf{p}\bullet\textbf{q})\frac{1}{r^{3}} + 3(\textbf{p}\bullet\textbf{r})(\textbf{q}\bullet\textbf{r})\frac{1}{r^{5}}

r is distance between field point and dipole source, \textbf{p} is dipole moment, and I believe \textbf{q} may be quadrupole moment tensor (what is that anyways?),

How is the above equation derived ? and exactly how is it related to the more physically and mathematically lucid dipole potential below:

(\textbf{p}\bullet\nabla)\frac{1}{r} = -(\textbf{p}\bullet\textbf{r})\frac{1}{r^{3}}

It's derived from that equation simply by using it twice, first with p· and then with q·

(and because (q·)(p·r) = p·q :wink:)
 
Thanks Tiny-tim!

However, while you are still online, excuse my slowness: why is:

(\textbf{q}\cdot\nabla)(\textbf{p}\cdot\textbf{r})=\textbf{p}\cdot\textbf{q} ?
 
UAR said:
why is:

(\textbf{q}\cdot\nabla)(\textbf{p}\cdot\textbf{r})=\textbf{p}\cdot\textbf{q} ?

Because p.r = xpx + ypy + zpz,

so (q·∇)(p.r) = … ? :smile:
 
Aaah! Thanks! I was hesitant to do that due to a (poor notation)-induced irrational fear that p_{x'} was a function of x. But now I see it is not, since \nabla is w.r.t field point \textbf{r}, while \textbf{p} depends only on source pts \textbf{r'}.

One more question: What is \textbf{q} ?

By the way, you are truly a good mentor. Thanks for your help and keep up the great work!
 
UAR said:
One more question: What is \textbf{q} ?

No idea :rolleyes: … it could be anything, and the equation would still work :wink:
 
Hi Tiny Tim,

Thanks for your help and for your honesty.

Anyone else care to help physically and mathematically elucidate \textbf{q} in the quadrupole potential equation above. I read somewhere that it is called (or is related to ?) the "quadrupole moment tensor" (what exactly is that by the way?).

Thanks!
 
Back
Top