How Much Mass Is Ejected in Polar Jets?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on quantifying the mass ejected in polar jets from astrophysical objects, particularly quasars and proto-stars. It establishes that the mass of the jets is not solely dependent on the black hole's mass but also on its accretion rate. The Blandford-Znajek mechanism is highlighted as a crucial framework for understanding jet formation. Additionally, the impact of magnetic fields surrounding black holes on jet dynamics is emphasized, indicating a complex interplay between these factors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black hole accretion processes
  • Familiarity with the Blandford-Znajek mechanism
  • Knowledge of astrophysical jets and their formation
  • Basic concepts of magnetic fields in astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Blandford-Znajek mechanism in detail
  • Examine the relationship between black hole mass and jet mass ejection
  • Investigate the role of magnetic fields in jet formation
  • Explore recent studies on mass ejection rates in proto-stars
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students interested in black hole dynamics, jet formation, and the interplay of mass and energy in astrophysical phenomena.

patellar-myotatic
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
I would like a discussion to quantify just how much mass is ejected at the poles (including the mass equivalence of the photons) when jets form. In quasars the black hole presumably reaches over a Billion solar masses, where the mass is proportionate to the mass of the galaxy and is also related to the angular velocity. Is the mass of the jets also related to the mass of the black hole? In more modest conditions, have the jets of forming proto-stars been quantified?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
While jets are common in astrophysical objects, I don't think we yet have a quantitative understanding of the mass ejection mechanism. The rate of mass ejection is not simply a function of the mass of the black hole, but depends on the rate at which the black hole is accreting mass. If the black hole is quiescent, meaning that it is not accreting mass, then there are no jets. It is clear that magnetic fields around the black hole also play a significant role. Try looking up the Blandford-Znajek mechanism, which is the starting point for most jet models.
 
Here is a link to a recent paper on understanding the mechanism for the jets.
 
phyzguy said:
While jets are common in astrophysical objects, I don't think we yet have a quantitative understanding of the mass ejection mechanism. The rate of mass ejection is not simply a function of the mass of the black hole, but depends on the rate at which the black hole is accreting mass. If the black hole is quiescent, meaning that it is not accreting mass, then there are no jets. It is clear that magnetic fields around the black hole also play a significant role. Try looking up the Blandford-Znajek mechanism, which is the starting point for most jet models.
Thank you. If the accumulated mass of the quasar jets exceeded the diminished mass of the galaxy, then the rotation of the galaxy would be profoundly affected. I was wondering if this scenario is possible or common.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K