Quantifying deformation of a shape

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gkiverm123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deformation Shape
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on quantifying the deformation of a shape, specifically through the development of a single metric. Vivek proposes measuring area reduction but acknowledges its limitations. Suggestions include using the Sørensen–Dice coefficient for comparison, calculating mean strain via Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for a homogeneous solid, and considering size effects of the shape. The consensus is that while no single parameter can fully encapsulate deformation, a combination of metrics can provide a reasonable approximation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of deformation metrics and parameters
  • Familiarity with Finite Element Analysis (FEA)
  • Knowledge of the Sørensen–Dice coefficient
  • Basic principles of strain and stress in materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for calculating mean strain
  • Explore the Sørensen–Dice coefficient and its applications in shape comparison
  • Investigate methods for scaling deformation metrics by shape parameters
  • Study the implications of treating materials as homogeneous solids in deformation analysis
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for engineers, material scientists, and researchers involved in shape deformation analysis, particularly those utilizing Finite Element Analysis and deformation metrics in their work.

gkiverm123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Quantify deformation of a shape with single parameter
Hello all,

I hope this post is in the appropriate thread. Would anyone have any insight on a method to quantify deformation of a shape? For example, I attached two images of a white shape of interest at the center (one deformed and one undeformed). I'm trying to develop a metric/parameter (single number) that will quantify the degree to which the shape is being deformed.

One simple method would be to measure the reduction of area. However, this doesn't fully capture the deformation because sometimes the shape extends on the opposite side it is being deformed.

Thanks,
Vivek
 

Attachments

  • deformed.PNG
    deformed.PNG
    390 bytes · Views: 262
  • undeformed.PNG
    undeformed.PNG
    380 bytes · Views: 283
Physics news on Phys.org
gkiverm123 said:
I’m trying to develop a metric/parameter (single number) that will quantify the degree to which the shape is being deformed.
How about the Dice ratio?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sørensen–Dice_coefficient
gkiverm123 said:
this doesn't fully capture the deformation
No single parameter will fully capture something as complicated as deformation. You need to set your goal a little lower. You just want something that seems reasonable for the task
 
gkiverm123 said:
I'm trying to develop a metric/parameter (single number) that will quantify the degree to which the shape is being deformed.
Here's an idea: If the black part is a homogeneous solid, then it is deformed along with the white inside shape. You could calculate (FEA) the strain in the black part, and average to get a mean strain for the entire black part. That mean strain would be both quantitative and nondimensional, and should reflect the degree to which the shape is deformed. Some work on your part is necessary to verify this.

Check for size effects of the white area. It may be necessary to scale by the size of the white area, or by some shape parameter such as the ratio of perimeter to white area. Or the white area raised to some power. More work on your part...

Another possibility is to treat the white area as a homogeneous solid, and calculate the mean strain of that area using FEA. And another possibility is to treat the white area as a homogeneous plastic solid of unit thickness, and calculate the total work to deform it. Divide by the volume or by the area to get a mean work. This would not be nondimensional, but would be quantitative.

Sounds like a fun project. Enjoy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K