Quantitative Analysis of Francis Turbine: Questions & Confusions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the quantitative analysis of a Francis turbine, highlighting discrepancies in the degree of reaction (R) values, which were found to be negative below 110 RPM and exceeding 1 above 440 RPM. The participant confirmed the accuracy of their calculations but expressed confusion regarding the expected range of R, which should be between 0 and 1. Additionally, the relationship between discharge and speed was noted to be hyperbolic rather than the expected drooping shape, and the participant questioned the operational principles of the Francis turbine, particularly regarding the regulation of flow through guide blade angles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Francis turbine operational principles
  • Familiarity with fluid dynamics and velocity diagrams
  • Basic programming skills for simulation (e.g., Python or MATLAB)
  • Knowledge of turbine performance metrics, including degree of reaction
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the definition and implications of degree of reaction in turbine design
  • Study the relationship between discharge and speed in hydraulic turbines
  • Learn about the role of guide blades in regulating flow in Francis turbines
  • Explore the impact of RPM variations on turbine efficiency and performance
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, hydropower professionals, students studying fluid mechanics, and anyone involved in the design or analysis of hydraulic turbines.

ank_gl
Messages
741
Reaction score
0
so I am still very much confused about the quantitative analysis of Francis turbine, so i wrote a small program. I have attached a copy of the results.

Everything is fine, the results do match the normal circumstances. But upto speed 110, degree of reaction(R in the table) is negative, and over 440, it is over 1. I cross checked all the calculations by hand, and various values seemed to be OK. Is it really so practically?? I had the impression, it is always between 0 and 1(from its definition). And if it really is so, how can it be put forth qualitatively??

Second the relation between discharge and speed is sort of hyperbolic shape, whereas it is of drooping shape in the textbook. I am confused about this. One more peculiar thing, I didn't have to feed anything to calculate discharge, when i did, program said the code is over specified, so i deleted the discharge as input and it calculated successfully! Only input i entered is head and rpm!
Qualitatively, in a pelton wheel, a spear is pulled back & forth to regulate the flow. What is the procedure for the Francis turbine?,is it guide blade angle?

The angle which Vr1 makes with horizontal(also called the blade inlet angle), changes continuously as the rpm increases, so there is nothing as shock less entry, therefore the tip of the blade is always airfoil like(round). Am I correct??(I also noticed this in my fluid lab).

Or is it that a turbine is designed to serve only at the optimum efficiency and these variations with rpm are neglected??
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
velocity diagram
 

Attachments

  • New Bitmap Image.JPG
    New Bitmap Image.JPG
    16.4 KB · Views: 504

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
18K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K