Quantity of heat and changes of state

  • Thread starter Thread starter JulienB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat State
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a thermodynamics problem involving heat transfer and changes of state. A mass of ice at -10°C is mixed with water vapor at 120°C, resulting in liquid water at 40°C. The key equations used include Q = m⋅c⋅ΔT and Qchange of state = m⋅Λ. The correct approach to sign conventions in heat transfer is emphasized, leading to the conclusion that the mass of water vapor (m2) is approximately 30.7g when calculated correctly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics principles, specifically heat transfer.
  • Familiarity with specific heat capacities: cE (ice), cW (water), cD (water vapor).
  • Knowledge of latent heats: Λs (fusion heat of ice), Λv (vaporization heat of water).
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving heat transfer and changes of state.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of enthalpy in thermodynamics.
  • Learn about the first law of thermodynamics and its applications in heat transfer problems.
  • Explore advanced heat transfer equations and their derivations.
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple phases of matter and heat exchange.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying thermodynamics, educators teaching heat transfer concepts, and professionals in engineering fields focused on thermal systems.

JulienB
Messages
408
Reaction score
12
Hi everybody! To begin I'd like to say a big thanks to everyone who helped me on the forum lately: I passed my exams recently and without your help I'm not sure I could have done it!

1. Homework Statement


Now I'm on thermodynamics :)
A mass m1 = 150g of water ice of temperature T1 = -10C is put in an isolated container, which already contains a mass m2 of water vapor of temperature T2 = 120C. After a while there is only liquid water in the container at a temperature T3 = 40C. What was the mass m2 of the water vapor?

Fusion heat of ice: Λs = 333kJ/kg
Vaporization heat of water: Λv = 2256 kJ/kg
Specific heat of water ice: cE = 2.06 kJ/(kg⋅K)
Specific heat of water: cW = 4.19 kJ/(kg⋅K)
Specific heat of water vapor: cD = 2.08 kJ/(kg⋅K)

Homework Equations



Q = m⋅c⋅ΔT
Qchange of state = m⋅Λ

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I'm pretty much able to do this, but I do have a question regarding the signs in the equations.

If Q1 and Q2 are the heat needed respectively for m1 and m2 to reach T3, then Q1 = -Q2. If I take the absolute value, that gives me:

m1⋅(10⋅cE + Λs + 40⋅cW) = m2⋅(-20⋅cD + Λv - 60⋅cW)

Is that correct? Another student did the same but took the absolute value of each change of temperature (so had + instead of the two - on the right side of the equation), and we couldn't really find out yet what's right or wrong. Could someone please help us? :)

Btw I come up with m2 ≈ 40g with the minus, and m2 ≈ 30g with the plus. Hard for me to say which is right.

Thanks a lot in advance for your answers.Julien.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to be very careful with signs when doing heat transfer problems. If Tf < Ti, Q is negative and there has been a net loss of heat. If Tf > Ti, Q is positive and there has been a net gain of heat. Since no heat escapes, we must have:

heat gained + heat lost = 0

Heat gained = - Heat lost

Their should be + on the right side too, so I guess your friend was right
 
  • Like
Likes JulienB
Hi JulianB. Have you learned about the concept of enthalpy in your thermo course yet?
 
  • Like
Likes JulienB
@AbhinavJ @Chestermiller thanks for your answers! Chester I'm not familiar with enthalpy yet. I checked out the wikipedia page, and the formula looks like nothing I've ever seen.

But actually I've now come up with a new answer:

m1⋅(10⋅cE + Λs + 40⋅cW) = -m2⋅(20⋅cD - Λv + 60⋅cW)

And that gives me m2 = 40g. The difference is that I think that m2⋅Λv should be treated negatively, because the change of state goes from gas to water. Is that a correct assumption?
 
JulienB said:
@AbhinavJ @Chestermiller thanks for your answers! Chester I'm not familiar with enthalpy yet. I checked out the wikipedia page, and the formula looks like nothing I've ever seen.

But actually I've now come up with a new answer:

m1⋅(10⋅cE + Λs + 40⋅cW) = -m2⋅(20⋅cD - Λv + 60⋅cW)

And that gives me m2 = 40g. The difference is that I think that m2⋅Λv should be treated negatively, because the change of state goes from gas to water. Is that a correct assumption?
No. The right hand side should read +m2⋅(20⋅cD + Λv + 60⋅cW).
 
  • Like
Likes JulienB
@Chestermiller Okay :/ Why is that? Actually I guess I made a mistake in my last post, here is my train of thoughts:

Q1 = -Q2
10⋅m1⋅cE + m1⋅ΛS + 40⋅m1⋅cW = -20⋅m2⋅cD - m1⋅ΛS - 40⋅m1⋅cW

Is the difference between what you wrote and what I wrote because I didn't take the absolute value in my first line?
 
JulienB said:
@Chestermiller Okay :/ Why is that? Actually I guess I made a mistake in my last post, here is my train of thoughts:Q1 = -Q2
10⋅m1⋅cE + m1⋅ΛS +
40⋅m1⋅cW =
-20⋅m2⋅cD - m1⋅ΛS - 40⋅m1⋅cW

Is the difference between what you wrote
and what I wrote because I didn't take the absolute value in my first line?

Let me make it simpler for you. Forget about the formula Q1=-Q2 for a moment. Check the
processes for whether heat is gained or lost, refer to post #2 for this. Put the absolute values of the process in which heat is gained on one side of the '=' sign and for the process in which heat is lost, put its absolute value on the other side of the '=' sign.

When we use the equation Heat gained = - Heat lost, heat lost is always negative as it is just negative heat gained therefore a negative and a negative results in a positive
For example let water at 120C be cooled to 60C. Using mcDeltaT, we get heat gained by water= mS(Tf-Ti) = mS(60-120)= -60mS
which is negative and with the negative sign already there, it will result to be positive. Similar is the case with latent heats.
 
  • Like
Likes JulienB
@AbhinavJ Thank you very much for your answer. I get now a value m2 = m1⋅(10⋅cE + ΛS + 40⋅cW)/(20⋅CD + ΛV + 60⋅cW) = 30.7 g.

Just for curiosity (and to avoid making such mistakes in the future), should I always consider my "small Q's" (I mean by that each change of temperature or of state) positive, or are there any instances where there would be a minus in the equation? Maybe if for some reason I was to treat the case of a mass that gets hotter and then colder?

Julien.
 
JulienB said:
@AbhinavJ Thank you very much for your answer. I get now a value m2 = m1⋅(10⋅cE + ΛS + 40⋅cW)/(20⋅CD +
ΛV + 60⋅cW) = 30.7 g.

Just for curiosity (and to avoid making such mistakes in the future), should I always
consider my "small Q's" (I mean by that each
change of temperature or of state) positive, or are there any instances where there would be a minus in the equation? Maybe if for some reason I was to treat the case of a
mass that gets hotter and then colder?Julien.

Yes you can consider each small q as positive given you group all the processes in which heat is lost on one side of '=' and those in which heat is gained on other side. For a mass that gets colder and then hotter consider the net effect(Assuming no phase change occurred while heating and cooling) For eg I heat ice at - 20C to - 10C and then i cool it back to - 30C, the net effect is that it cooled to - 30C from - 20C
 
  • Like
Likes JulienB
  • #10
Super. You guys have been very helpful once again, thanks a lot!Julien.
 
  • #11
Here's a different way of thinking about it. Let q represent the heat content per unit mass of liquid water, water vapor, or ice relative to some reference state, such as liquid water at 0 C. So in the initial state, the heat content per unit mass of the ice and the water vapor are:

$$q_{ice,i}=-\Lambda_S-10 c_E$$
$$q_{vapor,i}=100c_W+\Lambda+20 c_D$$

In the final state, the heat content per unit mass of the liquid water is:
$$q_{liquid,f}=40c_W$$

Since the vessel is isolated (insulated), the final heat content of the system must be equal to the initial heat content:
$$m_1q_{ice,i}+m_2q_{vapor,i}=(m_1+m_2)q_{liquid,f}$$
Try this, and see what you get. Doing it this way helps prevent you from messing up on the signs.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes JulienB
  • #12
@Chestermiller Nice! I like this method too, it is somewhat a little more intuitive.

Thanks a lot.

Julien.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K