How much water remains as ice when wet clothing is dried in dry wind at 0°C?

In summary, the conversation discusses a scenario where wet clothing at 0°C is hung out to dry in an environment with an air temperature of 0°C and a dry wind blowing. After some time, it is found that some of the water has evaporated and the remainder has frozen. The question is to estimate the fraction of the water originally present in the clothing which remains as ice. The conversation explores the concepts of heat flux, heat sources, and phase changes, and concludes that the evaporation of water is the only possible heat source in this scenario. It is also noted that water can evaporate even at temperatures below 100°C and that the wind's dryness is what allows for this process to occur. The estimated fraction of water
  • #1
irhum31
8
0

Homework Statement


Wet clothing at 0°C is hung out to dry when the air temperature is 0°C and there is a dry wind blowing. After some time, it is found that some of the water has evaporated and the remainder has frozen. Estimate the fraction of the water originally present in the clothing which remains as ice.

Homework Equations


(At 0°C, specific latent heat of fusion of ice = 336 kJ/kg, specific latent heat of vaporization of water = 2500 kJ/kg, specific heat of water = 4200 J/Kg*K)

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, how do I begin this. I don't know how much heat dry wind delivers.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
irhum31 said:
Wet clothing at 0°C is hung out to dry when the air temperature is 0°C ... []

What the heat flux could be from the clothes to the air based on the assumptions made?
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
  • #3
stockzahn said:
What the heat flux could be from the clothes to the air based on the assumptions made?
Shouldn't there be zero heat flux as the temperature is the same? Or did I get it wrong?
 
  • #4
irhum31 said:
Shouldn't there be zero heat flux as the temperature is the same? Or did I get it wrong?

Correct. So what is the only possible heat source to receive the heat to evaporate water?
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
  • #5
stockzahn said:
Correct. So what is the only possible heat source to receive the heat to evaporate water?
The sun? Not a possibility due to zero heat flux.

I'm guessing this has something to do with the wind, but can't quite nail it.

If there's no temperature change, only phase changes can occur as they do not rely (directly) temperature. (But how on Earth am I supposed to send water to 100C for evaporation?)

Okay, so only phase changes will occur, but I still do not see any heat source.

I'll make a wild guess that it's 88%, if I take the ratio of the heat of fusion and heat of vaporization, see what multiple of water quantity can be transformed into ice for the same heat that is required by vaporization, and convert it to a scale of 100.

This seems wrong in every possible way.
 
  • #6
irhum31 said:
If there's no temperature change, only phase changes can occur as they do not rely (directly) temperature. (But how on Earth am I supposed to send water to 100C for evaporation?)

Water evaporates even when the ambient temperature is below 100° C.

If the wind is composed of dry air, this suggests its relative humidity (the amount of water vapor in the air) is zero or close to it. Air which is fully saturated with water vapor has a relative humidity of 100%.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_humidity
 
  • #7
SteamKing said:
Water evaporates even when the ambient temperature is below 100° C.

If the wind is composed of dry air, this suggests its relative humidity (the amount of water vapor in the air) is zero or close to it. Air which is fully saturated with water vapor has a relative humidity of 100%.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_humidity

Okay, so once the air is saturated, it won't take in any water. So, the amount of water that causes full saturation is our evaporated water. Everything else freezes.

How do I find the amount of water that causes saturation?
 
  • #8
irhum31 said:
The sun? Not a possibility due to zero heat flux.

I'll make a wild guess that it's 88%, if I take the ratio of the heat of fusion and heat of vaporization, see what multiple of water quantity can be transformed into ice for the same heat that is required by vaporization, and convert it to a scale of 100.

Correct (I calculated 88.15%)

irhum31 said:
The sun? Not a possibility due to zero heat flux.

If there's no temperature change, only phase changes can occur as they do not rely (directly) temperature. (But how on Earth am I supposed to send water to 100C for evaporation?)

You don't need 100°C for evaporation. A fluid evaporates as long as the partial pressure of the evaporated fluid (i.e. gas) is smaller than its vapour pressure dependent on the temperature. At 100°C the vapour pressure of water is 1 bar, that's why it evaporates very fast at this temperature, but also if the temperature is smaller it will evaporate (only slower) as long as the partial pressure of steam in the air doesn't reach the vapour pressure (otherwise nothing could get dried). As the wind is dry, which means it transports all the evaporated steam away and therefore stays dry, water can change its state from fluid to gas. The required heat is taken from the water itself, therefore part of the water evaporates, whereas the rest freezes - this works, because the vapour pressure over the solid phase of certain matter is smaller than over the fluid phase. But you will find much information about that topic in the internet (vapour pressure, Dalton's law, growth of ice particles in clouds, ...).
 
  • #9
stockzahn said:
Correct (I calculated 88.15%)
You don't need 100°C for evaporation. A fluid evaporates as long as the partial pressure of the evaporated fluid (i.e. gas) is smaller than its vapour pressure dependent on the temperature. At 100°C the vapour pressure of water is 1 bar, that's why it evaporates very fast at this temperature, but also if the temperature is smaller it will evaporate (only slower) as long as the partial pressure of steam in the air doesn't reach the vapour pressure (otherwise nothing could get dried). As the wind is dry, which means it transports all the evaporated steam away and therefore stays dry, water can change its state from fluid to gas. The required heat is taken from the water itself, therefore part of the water evaporates, whereas the rest freezes - this works, because the vapour pressure over the solid phase of certain matter is smaller than over the fluid phase. But you will find much information about that topic in the internet (vapour pressure, Dalton's law, growth of ice particles in clouds, ...).

Well, to be honest I understood very little of what you said, but that's because I haven't touched these topics yet. (I'm self-studying thermodynamics).

Time to explore these new topics! Thank you!

(on a side note, would you happen to know of a good thermodynamics book? The one I'm using isn't so great and is very confusing to work through)
 
  • #10
irhum31 said:
Okay, so once the air is saturated, it won't take in any water. So, the amount of water that causes full saturation is our evaporated water. Everything else freezes.

How do I find the amount of water that causes saturation?
The air is not going to get saturated by the water that evaporates from the clothes because there is virtually an infinite body of surrounding air to receive the evaporated water. Besides, if the air is moving at all, the air that contains the evaporated water gets swept away, and is replenished with fresh dry air.

For a good thermo book, try Smith and Van Ness, Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics. But, before that, for the questions you are asking, you should first consult a book on Physical Chemistry.

Chet
 

1. How does dry wind affect the drying time of clothes?

Dry wind can significantly reduce the drying time of clothes. The dry air helps to absorb moisture from the clothes, allowing them to dry faster. The movement of the wind also helps to circulate the air and speed up the drying process.

2. Can clothes be damaged by drying in dry wind?

Yes, clothes can be damaged if they are exposed to strong and constant dry wind. The wind can cause the fibers of the fabric to become brittle and break, leading to tears or holes in the clothes. It is important to monitor the drying process and avoid prolonged exposure to strong dry wind.

3. What is the ideal humidity level for clothes drying in dry wind?

The ideal humidity level for clothes drying in dry wind is below 50%. This level of humidity ensures that the air is dry enough to absorb the moisture from the clothes, but not too dry to cause damage. It is important to check the humidity levels in your area before hanging clothes out to dry in dry wind.

4. Is it better to dry clothes in direct or indirect dry wind?

It is generally better to dry clothes in indirect dry wind, as direct wind can be too strong and cause damage to the clothes. Indirect dry wind still allows for air circulation and moisture absorption, but at a gentler pace. If you must dry clothes in direct dry wind, it is recommended to use a clothesline or drying rack to prevent direct contact with the wind.

5. Can clothes drying in dry wind prevent mold and mildew growth?

Yes, drying clothes in dry wind can help prevent mold and mildew growth. The dry air and movement of the wind help to remove moisture from the clothes, which can prevent the growth of mold and mildew. However, it is important to make sure the clothes are fully dry before storing them to avoid any potential growth.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
947
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top