I Quantum field in curved space-time

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between quantum mechanics (QM) and general relativity (GR), specifically regarding the wave function of correlated particles. It highlights that non-relativistic QM cannot adequately describe scenarios involving curved space-time, as it relies on Euclidean distance, which is incompatible with GR. Instead, quantum field theory (QFT) should be employed to address these interactions in curved spacetime, where traditional wave functions do not apply. The conversation emphasizes the need for a framework that integrates both quantum mechanics and general relativity to understand particle behavior in curved geometries. Ultimately, the challenge remains in reconciling these two fundamental theories.
Gary Venter
Messages
16
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Quick question about relationship between QM and general relativity
The wave function includes coordinates for position in space. For two distant but correlated particles, do their distances and paths of movement used in the wave function follow the curved space-time of general relativity, or is Euclidean distance assumed in QM?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I support neither of your idea : Eucledian distance does not fit with GR and classical curved space-time doe s not seem fit with QM. If you could get an answer, you would be honerd as a pioneer of quamtum gravity.
 
Gary Venter said:
The wave function includes coordinates for position in space.
Here you are using non-relativistic QM.

Gary Venter said:
For two distant but correlated particles, do their distances and paths of movement used in the wave function follow the curved space-time of general relativity
Here you are trying to use relativity, which means you can't use non-relativistic QM. You have to use quantum field theory, and in curved spacetime to boot, in which there is no such thing as a "wave function". That's not how QFT models things.
 
Gary Venter said:
their distances and paths of movement used in the wave function
There are no such things even in non-relativistic QM. The wave function does not describe "distances and paths of movement".
 
  • Like
Likes gentlevandal
Gary Venter said:
TL;DR Summary: Quick question about relationship between QM and general relativity

or is Euclidean distance assumed in QM?
No. In quantum theory on curved spacetime, a curved geometry is used.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and pines-demon
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
914
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K