Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Quantum Imaging with Undetected Photons arXiv:1401.4318(quant phy)

  1. Oct 13, 2014 #1
    Hello all,
    I have been looking at the arXiv account of the quantum imaging experiment but there are certain features of the theory I am trying to get a better understanding of. The main thing at the moment is the relationship between the signal and idler photons.
    Consider those idlers that are blocked upon meeting the opaque parts of one of the objects. I'm assuming that the idler gets destroyed and at that instant (however that can be defined) the relevant complementary properties of its partner signal photon are defined and later displayed.
    But what are the relevant properties? I'm guessing it could be phase but I need to look up how to define phase relationships between photons of different frequencies.
    I suppose I need to look at the maths of it. It doesn't look too hard but I can't even make a start on it just yet because I'm not familiar with the symbols used. Can anyone advise me on where to look this stuff up?
    Thank you
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 15, 2014 #2
  4. Oct 18, 2014 #3
    Hello all,
    I have a feeling my question was perhaps daft or perhaps I didn't express it clearly enough. What I'm initially interested in is the relationship between the idler photons that are directed towards the object and the partner signal photons of those idlers. If any idlers interact with the object eg by being absorbed how is information of the interaction carried by the signal photons ?
    Thank you.
  5. Oct 18, 2014 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Maybe a link will help us ponder your question.

    Quantum Imaging with Undetected Photons
    Gabriela B. Lemos, Victoria Borish, Garrett D. Cole, Sven Ramelow, Radek Lapkiewicz, Anton Zeilinger
    (Submitted on 17 Jan 2014 (v1), last revised 27 Jan 2014 (this version, v2))
    Indistinguishable quantum states interfere, but the mere possibility of obtaining information that could distinguish between overlapping states inhibits quantum interference. Quantum interference imaging can outperform classical imaging or even have entirely new features. Here, we introduce and experimentally demonstrate a quantum imaging concept that relies on the indistinguishability of the possible sources of a photon that remains undetected. Our experiment uses pair creation in two separate down-conversion crystals. While the photons passing through the object are never detected, we obtain images exclusively with the sister photons that do not interact with the object. Therefore the object to be imaged can be either opaque or invisible to the detected photons. Moreover, our technique allows the probe wavelength to be chosen in a range for which suitable sources and/or detectors are unavailable. Our experiment is a prototype in quantum information where knowledge can be extracted by and about a photon that is never detected.

    An interview with one of the authors is available at http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v512/n7515/full/nature13586.html.
    Last edited by a moderator: May 7, 2017
  6. Oct 18, 2014 #5
    Thank you atyy. I have the arxiv write up and have read through it several times. I understand it in broad principle but am stuck on some points. Primarily I am not sure about how the information from the photons that interact with the object (one set of the idlers) is utilised by their partner signal photons. I suspect the answer is given in the maths. I don't have free access to the Nature article and I'm wondering if it contains more information than is give in the arxiv version. The interview looks like it might br promising and I look forward to reading it. Thank you very much.
  7. Oct 18, 2014 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I'm not entirely sure, but on a quick reading, it seems that if the idler photons are absorbed, then the two paths of the signal photons don't interfere. So by looking at whether the signal photons interfere or not, they can tell if the idler photon was absorbed or transmitted, and in this way they can get the "shadow" of the object.

    http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4318, p7: "Due to transverse spatial correlation between the signal and idler photons16, interference is only observed in the region of the 810 nm output beams corresponding to 1550 nm photons transmitted through the shape cut out of the cardboard. The region corresponding to the blocked 1550 nm photons presents no interference (equal intensity at each output of the beam splitter)"

    They show this "shadow" in Fig 3, which they call "Intensity Imaging".

    For a transparent object, the idea is the similar, but depends on the phase shift. They show they can also get images by "Phase Imaging" in Fig. 4 and 5.
  8. Oct 20, 2014 #7
    Thanks atty. I sort of understand that interference is not observed when one set of idlers is absorbed. I see it as being sort of analogous to observations made with the two slit experiment. What I'm trying to understand is how information from the idlers is carried by the signals, eg on page 5 it is written:

    ".....the position dependent phase shift imprinted on on the idler photons in path d is actually passed to the signal etc".

    But how? I feel reasonably confident that it is something to do with the entangled properties of the idlers and signals. I think my best bet is to read up more on entanglement between photons of different frequencies.

    I find so many other things unclear about the arXiv article. For example the implication seems to be that none of the pump (and a negligible amount of the signal) passes through path d, but I cant imagine there being any arrangement of filters , mirrors etc which is 100% perfect at directing certain frequencies. I can imagine ,for example, a small amount of the pump from NL1 passing via O and on to BS2. The amount might be small but so is the amount of signal small if the efficiency of down conversion is about one photon in ten to the twelve. I need to go through it again and try to get access to the Nature write up. Hopefully it will be clearer and with more data.
    Thanks again.
  9. Oct 20, 2014 #8


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Yes, it's entanglement of some sort.
  10. Oct 23, 2014 #9
    Thanks for your feedback atyy.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook