Ques 4: Can we use time shifting to simplify signal operations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter coolrp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Signals Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using time shifting to simplify signal operations, specifically with the signal x[n]. There are questions regarding the correct transformations for x[4-n] and x[2n], with confusion about the expected outputs. Participants debate the implications of time shifting and scaling on the signal, particularly how to handle the unit step function in calculations like x[n]u[2-n]. There is also concern about the removal of an answer by a participant, raising questions about its correctness. The conversation highlights the complexities of signal manipulation and the need for clarity in solutions.
coolrp
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
2j2u5jt.jpg


Kindly see the question above.

First signal is x[n]

Ques 1: we are required to find x[4-n]

The way I did, the answer should be (a) but one of the solution says (b).

Which is the correct one?Ques 2: What are we to do while finding x[2n]? Consider only 0, 1 and 2 as twice of those gives 0, 2 and 4 which is what we have from x[n]? or does the whole signal redistribute at -2, 0, 2,4, 6, 8?

Ques 3: How do we calculate x[n]u[2-n]?
I took unit step signal, flipped it at 0 to get u[-n] and then shifted it by 2 which makes the new step signal from -2 to - infinity. Multiplying this with x[n] gives zero. Is it correct?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
@salzrah Why did you remove the answer? is it wrong or what?
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top