Question about angular muon flux

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter safinenko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular Flux Muon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Gaisser parametrization of angular muon flux, specifically examining how zenith angles affect the flux and intensity of muons. Participants explore the implications of the parametrization in terms of muon decay and absorption, as well as the relationship between angle and intensity in different scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Safinenko questions whether higher zenith angles result in stronger muon flux and seeks reasons for this potential effect.
  • Some participants suggest that shorter flight lengths at higher zenith angles may lead to less decay or absorption of muons before reaching the ground.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of the zenith angle on the energy of muons and how it affects their intensity, with references to the Gaisser parametrization.
  • One participant argues that angular muons should not be assumed to have higher intensity than vertical muons without considering fixed energy comparisons.
  • The role of solid angle in the comparison of muon intensities at different angles is highlighted, indicating that the solid angle varies significantly between small and large zenith angles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between zenith angle and muon intensity, with some supporting the idea that higher angles may lead to stronger flux while others contest this notion, emphasizing the need for careful comparison and consideration of energy and solid angle.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the definitions of terms such as zenith angle and energy, as well as the implications of time dilation on muon survival, which remain unresolved.

safinenko
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

The Gaisser parametrization is something like:

\Phi_0(E,\theta)=AE^{-\gamma}\left[ \frac{1}{1+1.1E\cos(\theta)/E_{\pi}}+\frac{0.054}{1+1.1E\cos(\theta)/E_K} \right]

where A,\gamma,E_{\pi},E_K are constants. My question is: Is this saying that at higher zenith angles the flux of muons is stronger? Is there a reason for this?

Also, would this say that the intensity would be higher at an angle than at vertical for muons crossing the same opacity(=distance)?

Any input would be appreciated.

Thank you,

Safinenko
 
Physics news on Phys.org
safinenko said:
My question is: Is this saying that at higher zenith angles the flux of muons is stronger? Is there a reason for this?
The flight length is shorter, so less muons decay (or get absorbed) before they reach the ground.

Also, would this say that the intensity would be higher at an angle than at vertical for muons crossing the same opacity(=distance)?
Why?
 
Hi, thank you for your input.

mfb said:
The flight length is shorter, so less muons decay (or get absorbed) before they reach the ground.

From what I have always understood, \theta in the function was the zenith angle (angle from vertical). For example, here on top of page 3 the angle is defined from the vertical. So for \theta=0, E in the fraction is multiplied by 1; for \theta=60, E is effectively divided by half. So this leads me to think that angular muons have higher intensity than vertical. But obviously the distance muons travel vertically is shorter than at an angle!

Basically, this is the part that I am confused about.

Safinenko
 
The division by 2 indicates that the flight length doubled - you need twice the energy to counter this with time dilation. Therefore, E cos(θ) is a measure for the time the muon has to survive (in its own frame) to reach the ground.

So this leads me to think that angular muons have higher intensity than vertical.
No. If you want to make this comparison, compare muons with fixed energy.
In addition, take the solid angle into account: There is more solid angle between 79° and 80° compared to the region between 0° and 1° (as measured from the vertical axis).

If you want to take ##\phi## into account:
$$\Phi_0(E,\theta,\phi) =sin (\theta) \Phi_0(E,\theta)$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K