Question about arc length and the condition dx/dt > 0

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the condition dx/dt > 0 in the context of calculating arc length for parametric curves, specifically using the example of the curve defined by x = sin(t) and y = 1 for t in [0, π]. Participants clarify that while the integral formula for arc length assumes dx/dt > 0 for a single traversal from left to right, it can still be applied when dx/dt < 0, albeit with adjustments in the assumptions of the integral limits. The arc length remains consistent regardless of the direction of traversal, but the derivation details differ based on the sign of dx/dt.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric equations
  • Familiarity with arc length formulas in calculus
  • Knowledge of integral calculus
  • Ability to analyze the behavior of functions and their derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of arc length for parametric curves
  • Explore the implications of negative derivatives in calculus
  • Practice calculating arc lengths for various parametric equations
  • Learn about the properties of integrals and their limits
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians interested in parametric curves, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of arc length calculations and the significance of derivative signs in integration.

songoku
Messages
2,508
Reaction score
393
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
none
This is not homework

1686303490716.png


That passage is from James Stewart (Multivariable Calculus). I want to ask about the condition dx/dt > 0. If dx / dt < 0, the formula can't be used?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not ? Can you find a counter-example ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
BvU said:
Why not ? Can you find a counter-example ?
In my opinion, it can because from the derivation I don't see the need for dx/dt to be positive.

I just don't understand why dx / dt > 0 is written there in the text.

Thanks
 
songoku said:
I just don't understand why dx / dt > 0 is written there in the text.
If dx/dt > 0 then then x is increasing. Conversely, if dx/dt < 0 then x is decreasing.

Consider the parametric curve ##x = \sin(t), y = 1## for ##t \in [0, \pi]##. Graph this simple "curve" and determine its arc length from your graph. What does the integral formula for arc length of this curve produce?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
The length of a curve should be the same, whether you start measuring it from the left end (dx/dt &gt; 0) or the right end (dx/dt &lt; 0). Some details of the derivation will change if dx/dt &lt; 0; in particular the assumption that f(\alpha) = a &lt; b = f(\beta) must be replaced by f(\alpha) = b &gt; a = f(\beta).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Mark44 said:
If dx/dt > 0 then then x is increasing. Conversely, if dx/dt < 0 then x is decreasing.

Consider the parametric curve ##x = \sin(t), y = 1## for ##t \in [0, \pi]##. Graph this simple "curve" and determine its arc length from your graph. What does the integral formula for arc length of this curve produce?
The graph is horizontal line y = 1 and 0 ≤ x ≤ 1.

I think the arc length should be 2 because the curve is traversed twice, once from left to right for 0 ≤ t ≤ π/2 and then from right to left for π/2 ≤ t ≤ π.

From integration, I get zero

pasmith said:
The length of a curve should be the same, whether you start measuring it from the left end (dx/dt &gt; 0) or the right end (dx/dt &lt; 0). Some details of the derivation will change if dx/dt &lt; 0; in particular the assumption that f(\alpha) = a &lt; b = f(\beta) must be replaced by f(\alpha) = b &gt; a = f(\beta).
I think I understand more clearly now from your post and Mark's example. The condition dx / dt > 0 is to ensure the curve is traversed once, only from left to right. If I want to use integration to find the arc length, I need to divide it into two cases, for 0 ≤ t ≤ π/2 and π/2 ≤ t ≤ π then subtract.

Thank you very much for the help and explanation BvU, Mark44, pasmith
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K