Question about arc length and the condition dx/dt > 0

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the condition dx/dt > 0 in the context of arc length calculations for parametric curves, specifically referencing concepts from multivariable calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the condition dx/dt > 0, questioning whether it is necessary for the arc length formula to be valid. Some suggest that the formula could still apply even if dx/dt < 0, while others provide examples to illustrate their points.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing differing viewpoints on the necessity of the condition dx/dt > 0. Some have provided examples and counter-examples to support their reasoning, and there is an ongoing exploration of how the arc length might be calculated under different conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the derivation of the arc length formula may change depending on whether dx/dt is positive or negative, and they discuss the implications of traversing the curve in different directions.

songoku
Messages
2,509
Reaction score
393
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
none
This is not homework

1686303490716.png


That passage is from James Stewart (Multivariable Calculus). I want to ask about the condition dx/dt > 0. If dx / dt < 0, the formula can't be used?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not ? Can you find a counter-example ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
BvU said:
Why not ? Can you find a counter-example ?
In my opinion, it can because from the derivation I don't see the need for dx/dt to be positive.

I just don't understand why dx / dt > 0 is written there in the text.

Thanks
 
songoku said:
I just don't understand why dx / dt > 0 is written there in the text.
If dx/dt > 0 then then x is increasing. Conversely, if dx/dt < 0 then x is decreasing.

Consider the parametric curve ##x = \sin(t), y = 1## for ##t \in [0, \pi]##. Graph this simple "curve" and determine its arc length from your graph. What does the integral formula for arc length of this curve produce?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
The length of a curve should be the same, whether you start measuring it from the left end (dx/dt &gt; 0) or the right end (dx/dt &lt; 0). Some details of the derivation will change if dx/dt &lt; 0; in particular the assumption that f(\alpha) = a &lt; b = f(\beta) must be replaced by f(\alpha) = b &gt; a = f(\beta).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Mark44 said:
If dx/dt > 0 then then x is increasing. Conversely, if dx/dt < 0 then x is decreasing.

Consider the parametric curve ##x = \sin(t), y = 1## for ##t \in [0, \pi]##. Graph this simple "curve" and determine its arc length from your graph. What does the integral formula for arc length of this curve produce?
The graph is horizontal line y = 1 and 0 ≤ x ≤ 1.

I think the arc length should be 2 because the curve is traversed twice, once from left to right for 0 ≤ t ≤ π/2 and then from right to left for π/2 ≤ t ≤ π.

From integration, I get zero

pasmith said:
The length of a curve should be the same, whether you start measuring it from the left end (dx/dt &gt; 0) or the right end (dx/dt &lt; 0). Some details of the derivation will change if dx/dt &lt; 0; in particular the assumption that f(\alpha) = a &lt; b = f(\beta) must be replaced by f(\alpha) = b &gt; a = f(\beta).
I think I understand more clearly now from your post and Mark's example. The condition dx / dt > 0 is to ensure the curve is traversed once, only from left to right. If I want to use integration to find the arc length, I need to divide it into two cases, for 0 ≤ t ≤ π/2 and π/2 ≤ t ≤ π then subtract.

Thank you very much for the help and explanation BvU, Mark44, pasmith
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K