Question about C and Relativity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CuriousStuden
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of Einstein's theory of relativity, particularly focusing on the behavior of light beams in different frames of reference, as illustrated by a train and an embankment scenario. Participants explore concepts such as time dilation, the relativity of simultaneity, and the measurement of light speed from various perspectives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how time dilation affects the perception of two light beams traveling in opposite directions relative to a moving train, suggesting a conflict in understanding how time behaves in this scenario.
  • Another participant asserts that time dilation is relative to different frames of reference and emphasizes that both light beams would be measured at speed "c" by an observer on the train.
  • A later reply elaborates on the relativity of simultaneity, explaining that while light pulses reach points on the train simultaneously from the train's frame, they do not do so from the embankment's perspective, leading to a discussion on synchronized clocks and length contraction.
  • Participants express the need to consider time dilation, length contraction, and simultaneity together to fully analyze the situation from different frames of reference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are competing views on the implications of time dilation and simultaneity in the context of the scenario presented. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific effects of these concepts on the measurement of light speed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding how time and simultaneity interact across different frames of reference, particularly in relation to the propagation of light and the synchronization of clocks.

CuriousStuden
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So, I was learning about the theory of relativity through Einstein's book "Relativity" (haven't finished calculus yet, so this book works for me), and I had a question about an example.

In the book, Einstein describes the Special Theory of Relativity using the example of a train and the embankment it travels on. He states that, if one were to use classical mechanics and the principle of relativity, a light beam traveling at c relative to the embankment would be c minus the speed of the train, which is proved to be empirically false. To reconcile the two concepts, time is supposed to be dilated so that the beam travels more quickly to a person inside the train.

Now, this is where my question comes in. What if there were two beams, traveling in opposite directions parallel to the train, at c relative to the embankment. To a person on the train, under classical mechanics, one beam would travel at c minus the speed of the train (in the example above) and the other would travel at c plus the speed of the train. Which way is time dilated for the person on the train? If time is elongated, so as to make the beam that travels more slowly than c travel at c, then the other beam travels even faster, and vice versa.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Time is NOT "dilated" for anyone- except relative to some other frame of reference. In Einstein's example, one frame of reference is on the train, the other on the embankment. In your example, you have given only one frame of reference, the train. The answer to your question is that the person would measure both beams of light as having speed "c".
 
HallsofIvy said:
Time is NOT "dilated" for anyone- except relative to some other frame of reference. In Einstein's example, one frame of reference is on the train, the other on the embankment. In your example, you have given only one frame of reference, the train. The answer to your question is that the person would measure both beams of light as having speed "c".

I only mean "dilated" in the relativistic sense of the word. The example I am trying to say is essentially two of the Einstein examples put together, in opposite directions. Since the beams of light are traveling at "c" relative to the embankment, I am wondering how the time conversion would work when comparing that frame of reference to the train, as a conversion of time either increasing or decreasing from the embankment to the train would run into the principle of the propagation of light.
 
CuriousStuden said:
I only mean "dilated" in the relativistic sense of the word. The example I am trying to say is essentially two of the Einstein examples put together, in opposite directions. Since the beams of light are traveling at "c" relative to the embankment, I am wondering how the time conversion would work when comparing that frame of reference to the train, as a conversion of time either increasing or decreasing from the embankment to the train would run into the principle of the propagation of light.

This involves the "Relativity of Simultaneity". If you are on the train, each light pulse travels at c relative to you. If you are halfway between two points on the train and fire a pulse of light towards each, they will take the same amount of time to reach each point. The pulses will reach the points simultaneously. If there are clocks at these points that are synchronized in the frame of the train, they will read the same time when the light pulses reach them,

If you are on the embankment watching the train go by, the light pulses travel at c relative to you. In this case, one of the points on the train rushes towards the light pulse and the other runs away from it. Thus, in your frame, the arrival of the light pulse at each point are not simultaneous. Since we are talking about the same light pulses, and the same clocks on the train, the clocks still must read the same time when the light pulses reach them. However we have established that according to the embankment, the light pulses do not take the same amount of time to reach each clock. Therefore, according to the emebankment frame, the clocks on the train are not synchronized, even though they are synchronized in the frame of the train.

You also have to take into account that according to the embankment, the distance between the two points of the train are length contracted.

If you have to take all three, time dilation, length contraction and the relativity of simultaneity into account to analyze what happens according to each frame.
 
Oh, ok. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K