Question about calculus and education

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jkohn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Education
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the differing emphasis on limits in calculus education between MIT's OCW single variable calculus course and community colleges. MIT prioritizes the application of calculus concepts over extensive training in limits, reflecting the practical needs of engineering and physics graduates. In contrast, community colleges dedicate significant time to teaching limits, adhering to traditional pedagogical methods. The consensus is that while limits are fundamental, their relevance is often not effectively communicated to students, leading to a disconnect in understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, including derivatives and integrals.
  • Familiarity with the MIT OpenCourseWare platform and its course structure.
  • Knowledge of pedagogical approaches in mathematics education.
  • Experience with the application of calculus in physics or engineering contexts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the MIT OCW course 18.01 Single Variable Calculus for a comprehensive understanding of its curriculum structure.
  • Research effective teaching strategies for conveying the relevance of limits in calculus.
  • Investigate the role of limits in advanced calculus courses and their applications in physics and engineering.
  • Examine community college calculus syllabi to compare pedagogical approaches to limits and their effectiveness.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics educators, curriculum developers, and students seeking to understand the pedagogical differences in calculus instruction, particularly regarding the teaching of limits.

Physics news on Phys.org
I thought about this myself - because at the university where I teach, a great deal of time is spent on limits and infinite sums (in the integral calc course). I think it boils down to the fact that, as a practicing physicist or engineer, MIT graduates will mostly use applications of calculus itself and not so much the limits themselves (nb. they *do* use limits, but I think it would be safe to say that the limits they use are generally much simpler - esp. at an undergraduate level - than the limits involved in analysis/calculus).

However, because limits are fundamental to the ideas in calculus, an older, standard pedagogical approach deems it extremely important that students understand limits and be able to manipulate them.

In my own experience, this latter method is not really effective (if the goal is to underline the relevance of limits in calculus): when I ask students why they study limits in calculus, not one of them can explain their relevance to the rest of the material, which means that - even with all the emphasis & extra examples - the message isn't being communicated effectively.

It seems to me MIT has taken this same stance and attempted to stress the conceptual relevance of limits without ceding excessive learning time to developing the technical skills required for their manipulation - though I'm certain many will disagree with this approach.

I should add, that I expect limits are revisited or addressed in greater detail at a later time - for example in 18.01 I believe they circle back to limits at the end of the course. So they may have simply chosen to address limits more completely at a later point in the ugrad course schedule.
 
Last edited:
Generally speaking, a four year college- and particularly a college such as M.I.T.- will assume that students who are taking Calculus already have been exposed to "limits" even if they have not taken a Calculus course before.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K