Question about differential cross section

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
Attached below
Relevant Equations
Attached below
242124

242125

I have attached the two pages in my notes and I have the following question.
1. Where have the n_t*l gone in 9.9? (According to 9.5 why do they disappear?)
2. Why J_s=sigma_tot J_i? The dimension of flux is per m^2 and sigma is per area too, the dimension is not right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clara Chung said:
View attachment 242124
View attachment 242125
I have attached the two pages in my notes and I have the following question.
1. Where have the n_t*l gone in 9.9? (According to 9.5 why do they disappear?)
2. Why J_s=sigma_tot J_i? The dimension of flux is per m^2 and sigma is per area too, the dimension is not right...
Looks like an error to me...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung
Yes, insert ##n_t l## into (9.9) in such a way that the units are consistent on both sides.

A physical reality check: if ##l = 0## or ##n_t = 0##, i.e. the target disappears completely, what should we expect ##J_s## to be, regardless of ##J_i##? :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung
jtbell said:
Yes, insert ##n_t l## into (9.9) in such a way that the units are consistent on both sides.

A physical reality check: if ##l = 0## or ##n_t = 0##, i.e. the target disappears completely, what should we expect ##J_s## to be, regardless of ##J_i##? :smile:
Yes, it should be zero :)