Question about intensity of EM waves

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Poynting vector in describing the intensity of standing electromagnetic (EM) waves, particularly when reflected from a perfect conductor. It clarifies that while the Poynting vector, defined as 𝑆=𝐸×𝐻, is typically associated with traveling waves, it remains valid for standing waves despite the violation of the relationship cB=E at certain points. The conversation emphasizes that Maxwell's equations do not necessitate this relationship in all scenarios, thus resolving the apparent contradiction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Poynting's theorem
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic wave properties
  • Basic vector calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integral version of Poynting's theorem
  • Learn about the relationship between electric displacement field D and electric field E in free space
  • Explore the implications of standing waves in different media
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of the Poynting vector in various electromagnetic contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism who seek to deepen their understanding of electromagnetic wave behavior and energy transmission principles.

kelvin490
Gold Member
Messages
227
Reaction score
3
For electromagnetic wave if it's reflected from a perfect conductor standing wave can be form. I wonder why Poynting vector can be used to describe the intensity of standing EM wave. (see p.19 of http://web.mit.edu/viz/EM/visualizations/coursenotes/modules/guide13.pdf ).

From some textbooks the Poynting vector is used to describe the intensity of traveling wave. It is derived from wave without reflection and since Maxwell's equations are obeyed and therefore cB=E. However in standing wave since E=2Eo cos(kx)cos(ωt) and B=2Bo sin(kx)sin(ωt), the E and B do not obey cB=E at every point and the overall wave is not traveling in any direction.

Another question is, the Poynting vector of standing wave is pointing perpendicular to the E and B field and sometime has positive and negative value. It means that energy is transmitting to either directions in different times. However for standing wave cB=E is not obeyed, does it contradict Maxwell's equation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gruxg
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

One thing to keep in mind is that Poynting's vector is, well, a vector: ##\mathbf{S}=\mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{H} ##. You really do want to keep the vectorial nature whenever dealing with it. Also, Poynting's vector comes out of Poynting's theorem:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poynting's_theorem

This is derived for any electromagnetic field, not just waves. (It does not matter whether or not E=cB). In your case you have no Joule heating (no ##\mathbf{J \cdot E}## term). Consider the integral version in the link: it simply says that for a volume V that is enclosed in some surface S, the electromagnetic energy stored int he volume (volume integral of u) decreases when there is a net flux of power through the surface (integral of Poynting vector).

For your case it would be interesting to compute and plot the terms in the differential version. In your case, if the waves are propagating in the ##\pm \hat{\mathbf{z}} ##, ## \nabla \cdot \mathbf{S} = \frac{\partial}{\partial z} S_z ##, where ##S_z## is the z component of the POynting vector.

jason

EDIT: I found the notes you referenced a little hard to skim - but in case you are not familiar with D and H in the link I gave, in free space (like you have), ##\mathbf{D}=\epsilon_0 \mathbf{E}## and ##\mathbf{B}=\mu_0 \mathbf{H}##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kelvin490
kelvin490 said:
However for standing wave cB=E is not obeyed, does it contradict Maxwell's equation?
No. Maxwells equations do not require cB=E in all cases.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kelvin490 and jasonRF

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K