A Question about Kelvin’s circulation theorem

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Seyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid dynamic
AI Thread Summary
Kelvin's circulation theorem states that in inviscid flow with constant density and conservative body forces, the circulation around a contour is conserved for fluid particles. This raises the question of whether vorticity is also preserved for each fluid particle under these conditions. Analyzing the vorticity equation, it can be shown that under the same assumptions as Kelvin's theorem, the equation reduces to \frac{D\omega}{Dt} = 0, indicating that vorticity is indeed conserved. Therefore, Kelvin's theorem not only preserves circulation but also ensures the preservation of vorticity for fluid particles. This relationship highlights the fundamental principles of fluid dynamics in inviscid flows.
Seyn
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
In Currie’s fluid mechanics textbook, there is a statement “the vorticity of each fluid particle will be preserved.” as the result of Kelvin’s circulation theorem.
Kelvin’s circulation theorem claims that
For inviscid flow, constant density or barotropic fluid, conservative body force,
the circulation around an arbitrary contour is conserved following same fluid particle.
Does Kelvin’s theorem also guarantee the vorticity on each fluid particles? Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a look at the vorticity equation under the same conditions as Kelvin's circulation theorem. Does it reduce to \frac{D\omega}{Dt} = 0?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top