A Question about Kelvin’s circulation theorem

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Seyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid dynamic
AI Thread Summary
Kelvin's circulation theorem states that in inviscid flow with constant density and conservative body forces, the circulation around a contour is conserved for fluid particles. This raises the question of whether vorticity is also preserved for each fluid particle under these conditions. Analyzing the vorticity equation, it can be shown that under the same assumptions as Kelvin's theorem, the equation reduces to \frac{D\omega}{Dt} = 0, indicating that vorticity is indeed conserved. Therefore, Kelvin's theorem not only preserves circulation but also ensures the preservation of vorticity for fluid particles. This relationship highlights the fundamental principles of fluid dynamics in inviscid flows.
Seyn
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
In Currie’s fluid mechanics textbook, there is a statement “the vorticity of each fluid particle will be preserved.” as the result of Kelvin’s circulation theorem.
Kelvin’s circulation theorem claims that
For inviscid flow, constant density or barotropic fluid, conservative body force,
the circulation around an arbitrary contour is conserved following same fluid particle.
Does Kelvin’s theorem also guarantee the vorticity on each fluid particles? Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a look at the vorticity equation under the same conditions as Kelvin's circulation theorem. Does it reduce to \frac{D\omega}{Dt} = 0?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top