Question about lanthanides and actinides

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mickeyw
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the placement of lanthanides and actinides in the periodic table, highlighting that they are grouped separately due to similarities in chemical properties, such as the tendency of lanthanides to form 3+ valences. Alternative periodic table formats exist that do not separate these elements, but the conventional layout is preferred for aesthetic and practical reasons. The atomic radii of lanthanides and actinides are comparable, and their separation prevents an impractically wide table. Additionally, the electronic configurations of elements like lanthanum and cerium illustrate the energy levels of orbitals involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of periodic table organization
  • Familiarity with electron configurations
  • Knowledge of chemical properties of lanthanides and actinides
  • Basic concepts of atomic radii and valence electrons
NEXT STEPS
  • Research alternative periodic table formats and their implications
  • Study the electronic configurations of lanthanides and actinides
  • Explore the magnetic properties of gadolinium (Gd) and its unpaired electrons
  • Investigate the reasons behind the energy levels of d and f orbitals in transition metals
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and researchers interested in the periodic table's structure and the properties of lanthanides and actinides.

mickeyw
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a question about lanthanides and actinides... is there any reason that they broke both the lanthanides and actinides from the periodic table?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mickeyw said:
I have a question about lanthanides and actinides... is there any reason that they broke both the lanthanides and actinides from the periodic table?
That is not necessarily the case. This website - chemlab.pc.maricopa.edu/periodic/periodic.html - has alternative forms of the periodic table, however there seems to be some problem with it at the time this is posted. But the main idea is that there are alternate forms that do not 'break out' the lathanides and actinides. They are grouped however for reasons of similarity in some chemical properties. For example, the lanthanides tend to form 3+ valences, and so the oxides are generally M2O3. The atomic radii are fairly close for the lanthanides and actinides - http://www.webelements.com/webelements/properties/text/image-balls/atomic-radius-emp.html

The transitional metals fall nicely between alkali Earth's and poor metals and metalloids - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table for an explanation.

See also http://www.webelements.com/.

One could put the lanthanides and actinides (periods 6 and 7, respectivley) between groups 2 and 13, but then the table would be very wide. See - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table_%28wide%29
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They broke them off just so that the periodic table would look nicer. If they we all together they would have to be in the middle of two other rows (as opposed to having two rows of their own) and thus the periodic table would be impracticably long and hard to print.
 
y thanx! :biggrin:
 
why the last electron of the element lanthanum enters the d orbital instead of entering the f orbital ?Same in actinum ? Why ?
 
http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/La/econ.html
There is a really cool flash (9) player for electron configs. One can browse by Z.

Ostensibly the 5d1 level is at a lower energy state than 4f1. Cerium (Z=58) then has 5d14f1, but praseodymium (Z=59) has 4f3.

Then Gd (Z=64) has electronic config [Xe].4f7.5d1.6s2, and all the 4f electrons are unpaired. Gd has some interesting magnetic properties.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K