mickeyw
- 2
- 0
I have a question about lanthanides and actinides... is there any reason that they broke both the lanthanides and actinides from the periodic table?
The discussion centers on the placement of lanthanides and actinides in the periodic table, highlighting that they are grouped separately due to similarities in chemical properties, such as the tendency of lanthanides to form 3+ valences. Alternative periodic table formats exist that do not separate these elements, but the conventional layout is preferred for aesthetic and practical reasons. The atomic radii of lanthanides and actinides are comparable, and their separation prevents an impractically wide table. Additionally, the electronic configurations of elements like lanthanum and cerium illustrate the energy levels of orbitals involved.
PREREQUISITESChemistry students, educators, and researchers interested in the periodic table's structure and the properties of lanthanides and actinides.
That is not necessarily the case. This website - chemlab.pc.maricopa.edu/periodic/periodic.html - has alternative forms of the periodic table, however there seems to be some problem with it at the time this is posted. But the main idea is that there are alternate forms that do not 'break out' the lathanides and actinides. They are grouped however for reasons of similarity in some chemical properties. For example, the lanthanides tend to form 3+ valences, and so the oxides are generally M2O3. The atomic radii are fairly close for the lanthanides and actinides - http://www.webelements.com/webelements/properties/text/image-balls/atomic-radius-emp.htmlmickeyw said:I have a question about lanthanides and actinides... is there any reason that they broke both the lanthanides and actinides from the periodic table?