Question about potential energy

  • B
  • Thread starter Xalkias
  • Start date
  • #1
7
0
Let's say we have a mass M at the ground of the earth with speed U going upwards so its energy is E= kinetic. The speed is enough to surpass earth's gravitational field so now it has a speed U2<U and its energy now is E= kinetic+potential. So my question now is: Is this potential energy lost? I mean when it's in the gravitational field its kinetic energy converts to potential and potential to kinetic when back down... So when it exits the field potential can no longer convert to kinetic? If this is the case where does potential energy goes ?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
nasu
Gold Member
3,772
429
It never exits the field. The gravitational field of teh Earth is not limited to a finite region of space.
 
  • #3
142
64
Like the post above mine says, the body never escapes the field. The potential energy is ##U=-\frac{GM_em}{r}## . As the distance increases, ##U## tends to zero.
For a body to escape the pull of earth its kinetic energy ##K## must be greater than ##U## i.e., the total energy ##E=K+U## must be positive ( ##E## is constant).
As the distance increases, ##U## goes to zero and ##K## slowly decreases. The total energy ##E## will always remain constant though.
 
  • #4
7
0
What about U=mgh ? As far as I know acording to this equation potential energy seems to be positive but also getting bigger as h growing. What's going on?
 
  • #5
142
64
What about U=mgh ? As far as I know acording to this equation potential energy seems to be positive but also getting bigger as h growing. What's going on?
##U=mgh## is only an approximate relation ( where g doesn't change appreciably with distance). For your case, where the body wants to escape the earth's attraction, you cannot assume ##g## to be constant. Also, in ##U=mgh##, the potential at the earth's surface is zero and at a very large distance it's infinity. Compare this to ##-\frac {GM_em}{r}##
 
  • #6
jbriggs444
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
9,580
4,242
What about U=mgh ? As far as I know acording to this equation potential energy seems to be positive but also getting bigger as h growing. What's going on?
Only differences in potential energy are physically meaningful. The actual value at a chosen reference point is irrelevant.

When using ##U\, = \, mgh##, one is implicitly assuming a reference point at ground level, a height measured up from ground level and a potential energy of zero at the reference point.

When using ##U \, = \, - \frac{GM_em}{r}##, one is assuming a reference point at infinity, a radius measured out from the center of the earth and a potential energy of zero at the reference point.

The difference between potential energy of a mass at a height of 10 meters above the earth's surface and the potential energy energy of a mass at the earth's surface is the same, either way. Both formulas give the same answer for the difference.
 
  • #7
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2020 Award
25,486
5,004
What about U=mgh ? As far as I know acording to this equation potential energy seems to be positive but also getting bigger as h growing. What's going on?
What's going on is that the gravitational potential on the Earth's surface is Negative (with respect to infinity). Moving upwards is going in the Positive direction (doing work against gravity). It's like climbing up a mineshaft. The whole shaft has negative height but your height is increasing as you move up. I heard the term "Number Line" on the Radio, this morning. Moving right on the number line is always Increasing; going Up through the gravity field is Increasing your Potential.
-GmM/(Greater R) is more than -GmM/(Small R)

As far as gravity is concerned, the absolute potential Everywhere in the Universe is Negative (until they find something with Negative Mass).
 

Related Threads on Question about potential energy

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
861
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
707
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
Top