Question about reflectivity and maximization of energy reflected

AI Thread Summary
To maximize the energy reflected off a pond with a refractive index of 9.0, the dipole should be oriented perpendicular to the plane of incidence, ensuring the electric field is also perpendicular. The discussion highlights the relationship between the reflection coefficients for parallel and perpendicular electric fields, indicating that perpendicular orientation yields greater reflection. The optimal incident angle for maximum reflection is suggested to approach π/2. Additionally, the concept of Brewster's angle is recommended for further study, as it relates to minimizing reflection for certain orientations. Understanding these principles is crucial for effective microwave transmission and reflection.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
Imagine that we have a transmitter of microwaves that radiates a linearly polarized wave whose E field is known to be parallel to the dipole direction. We wish to reflect as much energy as possible off the surface of a pond (having an index of refraction of 9.0). Find the necessary incident angle and comment on the orientation of the beam.

I have solved it, but since the textbook has no solutions on it i would like to know if you agree with my answer:
Since for electric field perpendicular to the plane of incidence $$r_{per} = sin^2(\Delta \theta)/sin^2(\sum \theta)$$

And for electric field parallel $$r_{par} = tan^2(\Delta \theta)/tan^2(\sum \theta)$$

We have $$r_{par} = tan^2(\Delta \theta)/tan^2(\sum \theta) = r_{per} cos^2(\sum \theta)/cos^2(\Delta \theta) < r_{per} $$

So, since we want to maximize the reflected energy, we should make the dipole perpendicular to the plane of incidence.

The problem is about the angle of incidence. My answer would be something like:

"To got maximum reflection energy, make the dipole perpendicular to the plane of incidence, so that the electric field is also perpendicular to the plane. About the angle, make the incident angle of the wave ##\theta \to \pi/2##.

What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top