Question about stationary and mobile phases

  • Thread starter Thread starter Latsabb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mobile Phases
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of polar stationary and mobile phases in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and Gas Chromatography (GC). Participants seek to clarify the relationship between the polarity of the mobile phase and its effect on the speed of analyte movement through a polar stationary phase.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why increasing the polarity of the mobile phase would lead to faster travel through a polar stationary phase, suggesting that polar phases should attract each other and slow down movement.
  • Another participant clarifies that a higher polarity mobile phase increases the mobility of polar components in the sample, which may help in understanding the dynamics involved.
  • A different participant reiterates the confusion regarding the interaction between polar phases, questioning why a higher polarity mobile phase does not slow down the analyte due to increased attraction to the stationary phase.
  • One participant explains that the mobile carrier flows at a constant rate, and the movement of sample components depends on their polarity, with the most polar components being held more strongly by the stationary phase.
  • A later reply acknowledges that the reduction in retention time is related to the interaction between the analyte and the stationary phase, emphasizing the need for the mobile phase's polarity to effectively move the analyte along.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the interaction between the mobile and stationary phases is crucial to understanding the movement of analytes, but there remains uncertainty about the underlying reasons for the observed behavior, with multiple viewpoints on the nature of these interactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the dynamics of polarity in chromatography, and there are unresolved questions about the mechanisms at play in the interaction between polar phases.

Latsabb
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
We have been learning about HPLC and GC machines, and discussing the various types of columns, and I felt that everything was pretty clear and obvious. However, something from yesterday made me a bit confused, so I am hoping for some clarity. If you have a polar stationary phase, and you want the mobile phase to travel through the column faster, you want to up the polarity of the mobile phase. But why is that? It seemed to me like it would be the opposite, as two polar phases would "grip" each other, and actually make it travel slower. I thought that this would most certainly be the case in something like an open tube column, where a polar mobile phase would have much more interaction with a polar stationary phase.

Can someone shed some light on this, please? I am having trouble wrapping my head around it. Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The "mobile phase" in the instance you're discussing is probably the carrier. Higher polarity increases mobility of the polar components of the sample you're trying to separate.
 
Yes, the mobile phase is the carrier liquid for the analyte. And I understand that a higher polarity mobile phase travels faster through a column with a polar stationary phase, but I am curious as to why. Typically polar things draw each other closer, and provide a force of attraction, which would make me think that the liquid would travel slower due to more "grip" from the stationary phase. That clearly isn't how it works, but I would like to know why.
 
Latsabb said:
something from yesterday made me a bit confused, so I am hoping for some clarity. If you have a polar stationary phase, and you want a polar adsorbed phase to travel through the column faster, you want to up the polarity of the mobile phase.

The mobile carrier is flowing at a constant rate whether you have sample on the column or not; when a sample is injected at the head of the column the rates at which sample components move through the column are a function of their polarity, for the polar case we're discussing, the most polar being held most strongly on the stationary phase (to the point of permanent attachment if the carrier is not polar enough to dissolve it), and the least polar being freely soluble and only slightly held on the stationary phase can be swept through at nearly the same flow rate as the "mobile"/carrier phase.

Help?
 
Ah! Yes, this helps quite a bit. So the reduction in retention time is not due to the flow rate being changed, but rather the interaction between the analyte and the stationary phase. And the reason a higher polarity mobile phase speeds it up is that it needs the polarity to "tug" the analyte along, or else the analyte would stay in/with the stationary phase. Thank you very much! This makes much more sense now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K