Question about symmetry with potential fields.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the motion of an electron between a cathode and an anode under a potential difference of 300V. Participants explore the implications of symmetry in relation to potential difference and the final velocity of the electron.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the assumption that at half the distance to the anode, the potential difference could be considered half (150V). There are attempts to relate this to conservation of energy and the work done on the charge. Questions arise about the validity of these assumptions and their utility in solving the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on calculating work done through potential difference, while others express uncertainty about the effectiveness of their arguments. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the assumption of potential at mid-distance.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of uniform electric fields and the significance of potential differences in the context of their calculations. There is a focus on understanding the relationship between distance and potential in this specific setup.

mateomy
Messages
305
Reaction score
0
Quick question (I think anyway)

I'm currently trying to solve a problem that essentially is asking for me to find the final velocity of an electron that is traveling between a cathode and an anode of potential difference 300. At half the distance to the anode can I assume by symmetry that it would be half the total potential difference i.e. 150V?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mateomy said:
Quick question (I think anyway)

I'm currently trying to solve a problem that essentially is asking for me to find the final velocity of an electron that is traveling between a cathode and an anode of potential difference 300. At half the distance to the anode can I assume by symmetry that it would be half the total potential difference i.e. 150V?

You could... How do think that will help you?
 
Well if I know the potential at one end is say, 300V and I arbitrarily set the cathode side to 0 for sake of convenience -knowing that it is only the difference in potential that is important- and I want two values; one half way and one full displacement, symmetry can help a lot. If I make that argument I can conclude that half the distance would be half the potential.
 
mateomy said:
Well if I know the potential at one end is say, 300V and I arbitrarily set the cathode side to 0 for sake of convenience -knowing that it is only the difference in potential that is important- and I want two values; one half way and one full displacement, symmetry can help a lot. If I make that argument I can conclude that half the distance would be half the potential.

Oookaaay... still not seeing the utility of that for solving a problem which is otherwise quite straightforward. However, I am prepared to be amazed :smile:
 
I was attempting to try it with conservation of energy.

[tex] \frac{1}{2} m(v^2)_i + q\phi_i = \frac{1}{2} m(v^2)_f + q\phi_f[/tex]

Where [itex]v_i[/itex] is 0, and [itex]\phi_i[/itex] is 300 and q is the charge of the electron. Manipulation of this equation, isolating final velocity I get a difference of potentials under a square root. That's why I have to make an assumption based on symmetry. Does that work?
 
Last edited:
If I may suggest, why not calculate the work done in moving a charge q through a potential difference V?
 
Hmmm, seemed to have overlooked such an obvious way of doing it. I will get right on that. In any case does my argument have any validity?

Thanks for the pointers by the way.
 
mateomy said:
Hmmm, seemed to have overlooked such an obvious way of doing it. I will get right on that. In any case does my argument have any validity?

I'm afraid I just can't picture a way forward with it; to me it just seems to divide the problem into two problems with the same unknown quantities.
 
I don't know. It only leaves one unknown being [itex]\phi_f[/itex] with the obvious exception of the final velocity. Which brings me back to the initial question, can I assume the potential would be half its max (or min) at half the distance? If it is, then I only have the one unknown of the final velocity. Maybe I'm overlooking something, but it seems pretty easy to solve that way as well so long as I can make that assumption with respect to the potential.
 
  • #10
The electric field between (sufficiently large) plates is essentially uniform, so yes, halfway between the plates the potential should be half as well.
 
  • #11
Great, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K