Question About the Hamiltonian

  • Thread starter Thread starter kq6up
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian
AI Thread Summary
The Hamiltonian is defined as the sum of the product of momenta and velocities minus the Lagrangian, expressed as ##\mathcal{H} \equiv \sum_{i}^{all} p_{i} \dot{q}_{i} - \mathcal{L}##. It is considered a function of the generalized coordinates ##q## and momenta ##p## rather than velocities ##\dot{q}##. To achieve this representation, a change of variables is necessary to express ##\dot{q}## in terms of ##p## and ##q##. This transformation is crucial for the transition from Lagrangian to Hamiltonian mechanics. Understanding this relationship is essential for grasping the fundamentals of Hamiltonian dynamics.
kq6up
Messages
366
Reaction score
13
If the hamiltonian is defined as ##\mathcal{H}\equiv \sum _{ i }^{ all }{ p_{ i }\dot { q } _{ i } } - \mathcal{L} ##, how is it considered a function of ##p## and ##q## instead of ##p## and ##\dot{q}##?

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should make a change of variables at the end to find ##\dot{q}## in terms of ##p,q##.
 
  • Like
Likes kq6up
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Back
Top