Question about the radiation around Neutron Stars or Pulsars

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the radiation emitted by neutron stars and supernovae, particularly in relation to the habitability of planets formed in their vicinity. It clarifies that supernovae, not novas, are responsible for the creation of neutron stars. The electromagnetic radiation, especially gamma rays, emitted during a supernova can induce nuclear reactions, potentially leaving behind radioactive materials. However, it is theorized that relocating planets away from these radiation sources could render them habitable over time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neutron stars and supernovae
  • Basic knowledge of electromagnetic radiation, particularly gamma rays
  • Familiarity with concepts of radioactivity and nuclear reactions
  • Awareness of planetary habitability factors
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of gamma radiation on planetary environments
  • Explore models of radiation dissipation over time
  • Study the process of terraforming planets in hostile environments
  • Investigate the long-term effects of radiation on biological systems
USEFUL FOR

Science fiction writers, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in the implications of radiation on planetary habitability and the dynamics of celestial bodies.

Althistorybuff
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I have a sci-fi idea regarding being able to move planets around like billiard balls.

I'm theorizing that, after a nova, some of the bands of material around a star formed a new ring of rocky planets around a Neutron Star. Naturally, these are bathed in radiation.

Having never taken high school physics, would the electromagnetic radiation and radio waves emitted leave a "toxic" environment like spent nuclear fuel here or would removing the planet from the offending pulsar or neutron star remove the problem? i

Basically, I am creating a world and want to know if one could theoretically move planets to a more desirable neighborhood, how long would it take for the radiation to dissipate (half-life out) etc, assuming that these are even the right terms for this type of radiation. I didn't understand the Wikipedia entry so I thought I might try to get someone to dumb it down for me.

So, would being battered by electromagnetic radiation for potentially millions of years create a situation where even a terraformed planet would be uninhabitable or does this type of radiation not leave this long term problem?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Althistorybuff said:
after a nova

I think you mean a supernova--that's what can turn an ordinary star into a neutron star. A nova (as opposed to a supernova) doesn't do that.

Althistorybuff said:
would the electromagnetic radiation and radio waves emitted leave a "toxic" environment like spent nuclear fuel here or would removing the planet from the offending pulsar or neutron star remove the problem?

The kind of EM radiation emitted by a supernova--gamma rays--can induce nuclear reactions, so it could leave behind radioactive materials. I don't know if anyone has tried to model this in any detail, though. For purposes of sci-fi, I think you could assume that planets removed from the radiation environment could be made habitable.
 
Moderator's note: moved to the sci-fi forum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K