Question about the units of acceleration?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kattahk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Units
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The unit of acceleration is defined as meters per second squared (m/s²). Standard acceleration due to gravity is quantified as 9.8 m/s². Various expressions of acceleration, such as 4.9 m/0.5s² or 588 m/min², illustrate that while the numerical value changes with unit conversion, the underlying dimension remains consistent as length divided by time squared. This reflects the principle that the meaning of a measurement is contingent upon the agreed-upon units of measurement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly kinematics.
  • Familiarity with units of measurement in physics.
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis.
  • Ability to convert between different units of acceleration.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research dimensional analysis in physics.
  • Learn about unit conversions for acceleration and other physical quantities.
  • Explore the implications of standard units in scientific communication.
  • Study the principles of kinematics and their applications in real-world scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching kinematics, and professionals involved in scientific research or engineering who require a clear understanding of acceleration and unit conversions.

kattahk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The general unit if acceleration is meter per second per second.

Let's play with the unit of the standard acceleration due to gravity which is 9.8 meter per second per second.

Thus how acceleration can be explained if its unit is expressed as 4.9 meter per half second per second or 588 meter per second per minute or 35280 meter per second per hour.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All you've done is change the units.

The dimension is still length/(time^2), so it's still an acceleration.
 
It's no more mysterious than the room I'm in being 8ft long, and also 2.4m long, and 0.0024km long. I can't communicate anything helpful by saying "it's this long", so we agree on a standard length and write a distance as multiples of that length. If we agree different standard lengths then the same distance is a different number of standard lengths.

Acceleration is a bit more complex because you've got a standard length and two standard time intervals to play with, but the principle is the same. The number doesn't mean anything on its own. The unit on its own doesn't mean anything. The number times the unit means the same thing whether you choose ms-2 or atto-parsecs per micro-fortnight per nano-year.
 
Is there a question here?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K