Question about thermal physics -- Ice cubes melting in water

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the thermal physics problem of ice cubes melting in water, specifically calculating the final temperature after the ice has melted. The initial calculations incorrectly used the specific latent heat of ice as 330 J/kg instead of the correct value of 330,000 J/kg. After correcting this error, the final temperature of the water was determined to be 32 degrees Celsius. The calculations involved the heat required for melting ice and the subsequent thermal equilibrium between the melted ice and the warmer water.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of latent heat, specifically the specific latent heat of ice (330,000 J/kg).
  • Knowledge of heat transfer principles, particularly thermal equilibrium.
  • Familiarity with the equations Q=mLf and Q=mcΔT for calculating heat transfer.
  • Basic skills in algebra for solving equations related to thermal physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of thermal equilibrium in heat transfer scenarios.
  • Learn about the specific latent heat of various substances and its implications in phase changes.
  • Explore advanced calculations involving multiple bodies of water at different temperatures.
  • Study the principles of calorimetry and its applications in thermal physics problems.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students studying thermal physics, educators teaching heat transfer concepts, and anyone involved in solving calorimetry problems in physics or engineering contexts.

ianc1339
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Ice cubes of total mass 150 g are placed in a vacuum flask holding 350 g of water at a temperature of 80 degrees Celsius. Assuming the vacuum flask loses no heat and has negligible heat capacity, what will be the final temperature of the water after all the ice has melted.
Relevant Equations
Q = mLf,
Q = mcΔT
First, I calculated the heat required for the ice to melt:

Q=mLf

Q=0.150×330

Q=49.5 J

Then, I calculated the final temperature of the water by forming the following equation:

Q=mcΔT

−49.5=(0.15+0.35)×4200×(Tf −80)

Tf=80.0 degrees celsius

But the answer says 32 degrees Celsius.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ianc1339 said:
Homework Statement:: Ice cubes of total mass 150 g are placed in a vacuum flask holding 350 g of water at a temperature of 80 degrees Celsius. Assuming the vacuum flask loses no heat and has negligible heat capacity, what will be the final temperature of the water after all the ice has melted.
What is the initial temperature of the ice?
ianc1339 said:
−49.5=(0.15+0.35)×4200×(Tf −80)
Having melted the ice, what masses of water at what temperatures do you have?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ianc1339 and Lnewqban
haruspex said:
What is the initial temperature of the ice?

Having melted the ice, what masses of water at what temperatures do you have?

It didn't say anything about it. So I'm assuming it to be 0 degrees Celsius.
 
ianc1339 said:
It didn't say anything about it. So I'm assuming it to be 0 degrees Celsius.
Ok, but what about my second question?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ianc1339
Welcome, ianc1339 :cool:
In real life, could the temperature of a mass of water remain the same (80 degrees Celsius in this case) if you add about half the mass of ice to it?

Your mass of water has more thermal energy than your mass of ice.
If you put both masses in direct contact, naturally a flow of energy from hotter to cooler will occur.

Once the thermal equilibrium is reached (there is no more energy flow), the original mass of frozen water will have a higher temperature and the original mass of water will have a lower temperature, the value of both being the same.

The calculation would be easier if you originally had two masses of water at different temperatures: the final temperature would be proportional to the masses.
In the case of this problem, some of the original energy of the mass of water must be used to melt the mass of ice, while its temperature remains at 0 degrees Celsius (heat of phase change).
From that point on, you have two masses of water at different temperatures and an ongoing flow of energy.

Please, see:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/phase2.html#c1

:cool:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ianc1339
ianc1339 said:
Q=mLf

Q=0.150×330

Q=49.5 J
What are the units attached to the numbers 0.150 and 330? Is your calculation consistent?

ianc1339 said:
Q=mcΔT

−49.5=(0.15+0.35)×4200×(Tf −80)
Does all the water cool down from 80°C? Doesn't some of it have to warm up from 0°?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ianc1339
Calculating latent heat required to melt ice:
##
Q=mL_f\\

Q=0.150kg\times 330Jkg^-1\\

Q=49.5 J
##

Calculating change in temperature of water:
##
Q=mc\Delta T\\

−49.5J=0.35kg\times 4200Jkg^{-1}K^{-1}\times (T_f −80^o C)\\

T_f=79.966^oC
##

Calculating temperature when the two bodies of water reach thermal equilibrium:
##
0.15kg\times 4200Jkg^{-1}K^{-1}\times (T_f - 0^oC) = 0.35kg\times 4200Jkg^{-1}K^{-1}\times (79.966^oC - T_f)\\

T_f = 56.0^oC
##

I still got the wrong answer... Where did I make an error in my working?
 
ianc1339 said:
## 330Jkg^{-1}##
Check that number, paying attention to units.
Didn't it seem wrong that the water was only losing 0.034oC?
(For the LaTeX, you need to put {} around the -1.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ianc1339
haruspex said:
Check that number, paying attention to units.
Didn't it seem wrong that the water was only losing 0.034oC?
(For the LaTeX, you need to put {} around the -1.)

My book said the specific latent heat of ice was 330 Jkg^-1. But with a quick google search, it turns out that it is actually 330000 Jkg^-1.

And yes, I ended up getting 32 degrees Celsius. I don't know why the book wrote down the constant wrong which is quite annoying.

Anyways, thanks for the heads up!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
688
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K