Question about velocity-dependent Lagrangian involving magnetic fields

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the Lagrange method to a velocity-dependent Lagrangian for a charged particle in a magnetic field. The magnetic field is represented as the curl of a vector potential, specifically ∇B = ∇×A, with a uniform magnetic field B0 corresponding to the vector potential ∇A = 1/2 B0 × r. Participants are tasked with verifying the relationship between B0 and ∇×A and demonstrating that the equations of motion derived from the Lagrangian, L = (1/2)mv² + e(v·A), align with classical Newton's law under the Lorentz force F = ev × B.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically curl and divergence
  • Knowledge of the Lorentz force law
  • Proficiency in applying Euler-Lagrange equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the curl and divergence in vector fields
  • Learn how to apply Euler-Lagrange equations to vector-dependent Lagrangians
  • Explore the implications of the Lorentz force in classical mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between vector potentials and magnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in classical mechanics, and anyone studying the dynamics of charged particles in electromagnetic fields will benefit from this discussion.

anton01
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The Lagrange method does work for some velocity dependent Lagrangian. A very important
case is a charged particle moving in a magnetic field. The magnetic field can be represented as a "curl" of a vector potential ∇B = ∇xA . A uniform magnetic field B0 corresponds to a
vector potential ∇A = 1/2 B0 x r.

(a) Check that B0 = ∇xA
(b) From the Lagrangian
[itex]\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}+e\overline{v}.\overline{A}[/itex]
show that the EOM derived are identical to the classical Newton's law with the Lorentz
force F = ev x B .

Homework Equations


Euler-Lagrange equations:
[itex]\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{s_{j}}})[/itex]=[itex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial s_{j}}[/itex]

Triple product:
a.(b x c)=b.(c x a)
a x (b x c)=(a.c)b - (a.b)c

The Attempt at a Solution



For a, I have tried using the triple product:
∇ x A = 1/2 ∇x(Bo x r) = 1/2 [Bo(∇.r)-(∇.Bo)r]
Since Bo is uniform, its divergence is zero and so:
∇ x A =1/2 Bo(∇.r)
From here, I guess ∇.r=2 for the proof to work, but I really don't see it.

For part b, I am not even sure where to start it. As in how can I apply the E-L equations to it? What scares me the most is how exactly do I take the derivatives on a Lagrangian involving vectors.

Any help is welcome, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


(a) Looks like you have ∇.B where you should have B.∇ in your vector identity.

(b) The Lagrangian is still a scalar - it's just that it's been written with one piece that's a scalar product of two vectors. So just expand out that product and do Euler-Lagrange stuff as usual.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K