Question about venturimeter formula

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation and application of the venturimeter formula, specifically the equations related to fluid dynamics as described by Bernoulli's principle. The two primary equations discussed are: 1) the general Bernoulli equation, which incorporates pressure, height, and velocity, and 2) the simplified form applicable to horizontal flow where height differences are negligible. Participants clarify that the teacher's method of crossing out velocity terms in the context of horizontal flow is incorrect, as it overlooks the implications of varying velocities in different pipe sections.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bernoulli's equation and its components
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics principles, including flow rate continuity
  • Familiarity with venturimeter applications in measuring fluid flow
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations involving pressure, velocity, and height
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Bernoulli's equation in detail
  • Learn about the application of the continuity equation in fluid dynamics
  • Explore the differences between horizontal and vertical flow in fluid systems
  • Investigate real-world applications of venturimeters in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those specializing in fluid mechanics, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to fluid flow and pressure measurement techniques.

songoku
Messages
2,509
Reaction score
393
TL;DR
Please see below
Untitled2.jpg

The level of this learning material is high - school level

From my note, there are two equations that can be used related to venturimeter:

1. ##P+\rho gh + \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 = \text{constant}##

2. ##P_1 + \frac{1}{2} \rho {v_1}^2 = P_2 + \frac{1}{2} \rho {v_2}^2##

I want to ask about second equation, how can we get that equation? My teacher said it is also from Bernoulli equation and we just cross out the ##\frac{1}{2} \rho v^2## part but I do not understand why. Don't the liquid have different velocity (##v_1## and ##v_2##) so why we can cross that part?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let ##h_1 = h_2##!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
The second equation is really the first equation in the case of horizontal flow.
The first equation gives $$P_1+\rho gh_1 + \frac{1}{2} \rho v_1^2 = P_2+\rho gh_2 + \frac{1}{2} \rho v_2^2$$. Then set ##h_1=h_2## as @etotheipi suggested.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku, Delta2 and etotheipi
I am really sorry, I mistyped the second equation

The second equation should be: ##P_1 + \rho gh_1 = P_2 + \rho gh_2##

That is the reason why I wrote the teacher crossed out the ##\frac{1}{2} \rho v^2## part and I don't understand why it can be done so.

I apologize once again

Thanks
 
Let ##v_1## = ##v_2##! nevermind
 
Last edited by a moderator:
etotheipi said:
Let ##v_1## = ##v_2##!
Why? From flow rate continuity equation: ##A_1 . v_1 = A_2 . v_2## and ##A_1 \neq A_2## so why we can set ##v_1 = v_2##?

Thanks
 
etotheipi said:
Let ##v_1## = ##v_2##!
That would mean ##A_1=A_2## which is not the case here.
songoku said:
Why? From flow rate continuity equation: ##A_1 . v_1 = A_2 . v_2## and ##A_1 \neq A_2## so why we can set ##v_1 = v_2##?

Thanks
We can't. Either you misunderstood what the teacher said, or the teacher was incorrect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and russ_watters
kuruman said:
That would mean ##A_1=A_2## which is not the case here.

Wait, where are we getting that from? I haven't seen any areas mentioned. If ##A_1 = A_2##, then ##v_1 = v_2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
etotheipi said:
Wait, where are we getting that from? I haven't seen any areas mentioned. If ##A_1 = A_2##, then ##v_1 = v_2##.
We get that from the figure posted by OP.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and etotheipi
  • #10
kuruman said:
We get that from the figure posted by OP.

Whoops, missed that. In that case, teacher is wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #11
kuruman said:
We can't. Either you misunderstood what the teacher said, or the teacher was incorrect.
The teacher said something like: the second equation is for the vertical pipes where the heights (or depth, I am not sure) of the liquid are different (one is ##h_1## and the other is ##h_2##)
 
  • #12
etotheipi said:
Whoops, missed that. In that case, teacher is wrong.
Perhaps teacher canceled the wrong terms thinking that the speeds are the same since the flow is horizontal and there is no change in gravitational potential energy per unit volume. If teacher is correct, then it is also true that ##h_1=h_2## which also means that ##P_1=P_2## which also means the ##1=2##, i.e. we are at the same section of the pipe. That's the trivial solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #13
I think teacher makes a huge mess of this problem.

It should be noted by the OP that the ##h_1## and ##h_2## drawn in the figure are not the same as the ##h_1## and ##h_2## that appear in the Bernoulli equation. The heights drawn in the figure only serve to represent the pressure difference. The most simplifying you can do is$$\frac{1}{2} \rho v_1^2 + p_1 = \frac{1}{2}\rho v_2^2 + p_2$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #14
songoku said:
I am really sorry, I mistyped the second equation

The second equation should be: ##P_1 + \rho gh_1 = P_2 + \rho gh_2##

That is the reason why I wrote the teacher crossed out the ##\frac{1}{2} \rho v^2## part and I don't understand why it can be done so.

I apologize once again

Thanks
If ##h_1## and ##h_2## are as shown in the figure, then it seems to me that ##P_1=\rho g h_1## and likewise for index ##2## so that the Bernoulli equation for the two parts of the horizontal tube should be
$$\frac{1}{2}\rho v_1^2 + \rho gh_1 = \frac{1}{2}\rho v_2^2 + \rho gh_2.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #15
etotheipi said:
It should be noted by the OP that the ##h_1## and ##h_2## drawn in the figure are not the same as the ##h_1## and ##h_2## that appear in the Bernoulli equation.
Yes, they are not the same

kuruman said:
If ##h_1## and ##h_2## are as shown in the figure
Yes, they are the height / depth of liquid in small vertical tubes measured from "horizontal line" that makes both "##h_1##" and "##h_2##" in Bernoulli equation have same value

kuruman said:
Perhaps teacher canceled the wrong terms thinking that the speeds are the same since the flow is horizontal and there is no change in gravitational potential energy per unit volume. If teacher is correct, then it is also true that ##h_1=h_2## which also means that ##P_1=P_2## which also means the ##1=2##, i.e. we are at the same section of the pipe. That's the trivial solution.
I am not sure if this helps. There is derivation of formula of speed ##v_1## in my note:

1. At horizontal pipe, the height will be the same so the equation can be reduced to:
##P_1 + \frac{1}{2} \rho {v_1}^2 = P_2 + \frac{1}{2} \rho {v_2}^2##

2. At vertical pipe, ##P_1 + \rho gh_1 = P_2 + \rho gh_2## where ##h_1## and ##h_2## are the depth of the liquid in the two vertical pipes (based on the picture, ##h_1 > h_2##)

3. Flow rate continuity equation: ##A_1 . v_1 = A_2 . v_2 \rightarrow v_2 = \frac{A_1}{A_2}.v_1##

From part (1):
##P_1 - P_2 = \frac{1}{2} \rho ({v_2}^2 - {v_1}^2)##
##P_1 - P_2 = \frac{1}{2} \rho \left[ \left( \frac{A_1}{A_2} \right)^2 .{v_1}^2 - {v_1}^2 \right]##

From part (2):
##P_1 - P_2 = \rho g (h_2 - h_1)##

##P_1 - P_2 = \rho g \Delta h## where ##\Delta h## is the difference between vertical height of liquid in vertical pipes

Equating those two equations:
##\frac{1}{2} \rho \left[ \left( \frac{A_1}{A_2} \right)^2 .{v_1}^2 - {v_1}^2 \right] = \rho g \Delta h##

After simplifying, we get:
##v_1=\sqrt {\frac{2g \Delta h}{\left( \frac{A_1}{A_2} \right)^2 -1}}##

So based on the derivation, this equation can be obtained by using equation from part (2)

Thanks
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Are we abandoning the horizontal venturimeter questione you posted in #1?

When you say "vertical pipe" what is the complete picture? Fluid enters the pipe and then what? Is the fluid in free fall going down or pushed in from the bottom at some pressure? What do ##A_1## and ##A_2## in post #15.3 represent? If a steady stream of an incompressible fluid is in free fall, as it accelerates its cross-sectional area decreases (see figure) because the speed increases.

Faucet.jpg


It seems to me that this thread started from an explanation of an equation related to horizontal flow and has been transformed to a question about vertical flow. Can you please clarify what you wish to understand?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and etotheipi
  • #17
kuruman said:
Are we abandoning the horizontal venturimeter questione you posted in #1?
No we aren't. My question is related to that picture

When you say "vertical pipe" what is the complete picture? Fluid enters the pipe and then what? Is the fluid in free fall going down or pushed in from the bottom at some pressure?
I post new picture to describe the explanation as best as I can
InkedInkedUntitled2_LI.jpg

I think (1) and (2) is the position of ##P_1## and ##P_2##

What do ##A_1## and ##A_2## in post #15.3 represent?
##A_1## is the area of larger horizontal pipe and ##A_2## is the area of smaller horizontal pipe

Thanks
 
  • #18
songoku said:
No we aren't. My question is related to that pictureI post new picture to describe the explanation as best as I can
View attachment 271748
I think (1) and (2) is the position of ##P_1## and ##P_2####A_1## is the area of larger horizontal pipe and ##A_2## is the area of smaller horizontal pipe

Thanks
Then what I said in post #14 applies. If you know the input speed ##v_1##, you can use the equation shown therein to solve for ##v_2##. Is that what you needed to do?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #19
kuruman said:
Then what I said in post #14 applies. If you know the input speed ##v_1##, you can use the equation shown therein to solve for ##v_2##. Is that what you needed to do?
No, I just want to know how to get the second equation. My teacher did like this:

At vertical pipe:
##P_1 + \rho gh_1 + \frac{1}{2} \rho {v_1}^2 = P_2 + \rho gh_2 + \frac{1}{2} \rho {v_2}^2##

Then he crossed out ##\frac{1}{2} \rho {v_1}^2## and ##\frac{1}{2} \rho {v_2}^2## and ended up with ##P_1 + \rho gh_1 = P_2 + \rho gh_2##. I want to know why we can cross these 2 terms out

Thanks
 
  • #20
songoku said:
No, I just want to know how to get the second equation. My teacher did like this:

At vertical pipe:
##P_1 + \rho gh_1 + \frac{1}{2} \rho {v_1}^2 = P_2 + \rho gh_2 + \frac{1}{2} \rho {v_2}^2##

Then he crossed out ##\frac{1}{2} \rho {v_1}^2## and ##\frac{1}{2} \rho {v_2}^2## and ended up with ##P_1 + \rho gh_1 = P_2 + \rho gh_2##. I want to know why we can cross these 2 terms out

Thanks

I don't think "we" can cross these terms out. We went over that in posts #7 - #10. If your teacher did it, you should ask him/her why it was done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #21
kuruman said:
I don't think "we" can cross these terms out. We went over that in posts #7 - #10. If your teacher did it, you should ask him/her why it was done.
Ok so for now I can say that the derivation in post #15 is not valid?

Thanks
 
  • #22
songoku said:
Ok so for now I can say that the derivation in post #15 is not valid?
Thanks
The derivation in #15 is almost correct if your task is to find ##v_1## in terms of the geometry and the height difference in the vertical columns. The problem with your derivation is this
You say in #15(1) ##P_1 + \frac{1}{2} \rho {v_1}^2 = P_2 + \frac{1}{2} \rho {v_2}^2##.
You know that ##v_2>v_1## because ##A_2<A_1##. It follows that, for the equality to hold, it must be true that ##P_2<P_1.##

Then you say in #15(2) ##P_1 + \rho gh_1 = P_2 + \rho gh_2##. Note that from the figure ##h_2<h_1## and we just concluded that ##P_2<P_1##. This second equality cannot be correct because the two smaller terms are on the same side. If you must use the Bernoulli equation for a static vertical column, you must write it at two points in the same column. Say we pick column 1, and choose as point A the surface of the fluid that is at atmospheric pressure and point B at the axis of the tube. Then, starting from the general Bernoulli equation,$$P_A + \rho gh_A + \frac{1}{2} \rho {v_A}^2 = P_B + \rho gh_B + \frac{1}{2} \rho {v_B}^2$$Here is what your teacher did, I think. The fluid in column 1 is not moving vertically, therefore ##v_1=v_2=0##. The model here is that you have a static vertical column of fluid standing on a horizontally moving tube of fluid. The gauge pressure at ##A## is ##P_A=0## and ##P_B=P_1##; the heights are ##h_A=h_1## and ##h_B=0.## WIth all this, the equation becomes $$0 + \rho gh_1 +0= P_1 + 0 + 0~\Rightarrow~P_1=\rho gh_1.$$You do the same with a second Bernoulli equation for the other vertical columns and get ##P_2=\rho g h_2##. Finally you write a third Bernoulli equation for the horizontal fluid that is moving and connect points 1 and 2. That third equation is what I put down in #14 which you have to solve for ##v_1##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #23
Thank you very much etotheipi and kuruman
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K