Question concerning curl for finding a conservative force field

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
sleventh
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hello all,
I understand the fact that the principles
LaTeX Code: F= \\nabla \\phi .

LaTeX Code: \\nabla \\times F = 0 .

must apply in order for a force field to be conservative however what i don't get is why showing:

LaTeX Code: f_y= g_x, f_z= h_x, g_z= h_y
where subscripts are what you are taking the derivative with respect to.

is a means to prove the above laws are in effect. i assume it has to do with the fact that subtracting the partial derivatives will give you zero. thank you very much for any help

sleventh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should specify what [tex]f[/tex], [tex]g[/tex] and [tex]h[/tex] are. It does look like you're using the fact that you can jointly express the two statements as

[tex]\nabla\times\nabla\phi = \mathrm{det}\begin{pmatrix}\hat{\mathbf{i}} && \hat{\mathbf{j}} && \hat{\mathbf{k}}\\\delta_x && \delta_y && \delta_z\\ \delta_x\phi && \delta_y\phi && \delta_z\phi\end{pmatrix}[/tex],
meaning, for example,
[tex] \hat{\mathbf{i}}(\delta_y\delta_z - \delta_z\delta_y)\phi=0,[/tex]
but not knowing [tex]f[/tex], [tex]g[/tex] and [tex]h[/tex], I can't comment further.
 
oh haha that should have been obvious thank you very much that clears everything up perfectly