Question for pressure engineer about cascading gas

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and calculations involved in cascading nitrogen gas from a high-pressure vessel to a lower-pressure vessel. Participants explore the dynamics of gas flow, pressure changes, and the implications of using a pressure regulator in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Exploratory, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario involving a high-pressure vessel at 5,000 psig and a lower-pressure vessel at 2,000 psig, aiming to raise the lower vessel's pressure to 2,700 psig using a pressure regulator and a specific pipe configuration.
  • Another participant notes that the flow of air through a 1-inch pipe will be relatively low in volume and questions whether the time estimate of 3 minutes to achieve the desired pressure increase is reasonable, considering the volume of gas required.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about what constitutes a reasonable time frame for the cascading process, despite having performed calculations that suggest 3 minutes might be feasible.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the time estimate of 3 minutes sounds plausible, but there is uncertainty regarding the volume of gas needed and the impact of pressure drop on flow rate. No consensus is reached on the accuracy of the calculations or the expected time frame.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the neglect of factors such as temperature, enthalpy, and pressure drop effects in the initial calculations, which may influence the accuracy of the time estimate.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for pressure systems engineers, students studying fluid dynamics, and individuals interested in gas flow dynamics in high-pressure systems.

steves1080
Messages
64
Reaction score
1
Say I had a high pressure vessel with a volume of about 1400 cubic feet and pressurized to 5,000 psig. Now say I had a lower pressure vessel with a volume of 1800 cubic feet (slightly higher) and pressurized to 2,000 psig. The goal is to "cascade" gas from the higher pressure vessel to the lower pressure vessel in order to get the lower pressure tank up to 2,700 psig. The gas would flow through a pressure regulator (with max output set point of 2,700 psig) fully opened up. The gas going into the lower pressure tank flows through a 1-inch diameter pipe and only about 30 feet in length. I've already done the calculations using the compressible mass flow rate equation for choked flow using ideal gas law assumptions and using the Cv of the regulator to determine the magnitude of the choke point. I neglected temperature, enthalpy, and pressure drop affects, and stuck to the basic physics behind it. But the answer I got for how long it would take to cascade that much gas was ~3 minutes. I am looking for an experienced pressure systems engineer to let me know if this sounds reasonable or if I need to do some more calculations. It would also be helpful to know what type of number to expect if this seems way off. For some reason I was expecting it to take much longer, but I don't have too much experience with high pressure gases. I've run my numbers multiple times, so I think I am correct.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I should note that the gas is nitrogen, so it's basically just air
 
The flow of air through a 1" pipe will be relatively low in volume, and considering the size tank you have, there's quite a lot of it required to raise the pressure by 700 psi. Also consider that the pressure in the first tank will drop as it's volume is depleated by the flow to the second tank, thus reducing the flow rate. As an off the cuff guess I'd say 3 minutes sounds reasonable.

I haven't crunched any numbers, so take that for what it is.
 
Thanks for the response. I did crunch some numbers, but the problem is that I have no way of gauging what seems reasonable. 3 minutes sounds possible to me, but on the other hand that it a lot of volume to fill that quickly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K