Question involving Levi-Civita symbol

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sunnyskies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Levi-civita Symbol
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
sunnyskies
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can someone please explain to me why

[itex]\epsilon_{ijk}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial A_k}{\partial x_j} = 0[/itex]

where A is a constant vector field.
 
on Phys.org
The double differentiation w.r.t the coordinates is symmetric: $$\frac{\partial}{\partial x_j}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}=\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_j}$$

On the other hand, the Levi-Civita tensor is anti-symmetric on i,j. Interchange these indices and you therefore get: $$\epsilon_{ijk}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_j}=-\epsilon_{jik}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_j}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}=-\epsilon_{ijk}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_j}$$
where in the second equality we have renamed the dummy indices (they are summed over) i to j and j to i.
So we get that something is equal to minus itself, and thus is zero.
 
Makes perfect sense, thank you!