Question involving Levi-Civita symbol

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sunnyskies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Levi-civita Symbol
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that the expression \(\epsilon_{ijk}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial A_k}{\partial x_j} = 0\) holds true for a constant vector field \(A\). This is due to the symmetry of double differentiation with respect to coordinates, which contrasts with the anti-symmetry of the Levi-Civita symbol. By interchanging indices, it is shown that the expression equals its own negative, leading to the conclusion that it must be zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Levi-Civita symbol and its properties
  • Knowledge of partial differentiation and vector calculus
  • Familiarity with tensor notation and operations
  • Concept of symmetry and anti-symmetry in mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Levi-Civita symbol in depth
  • Explore applications of tensor calculus in physics
  • Learn about the implications of symmetry in differential equations
  • Investigate the role of constant vector fields in vector calculus
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering, particularly those working with tensor calculus and vector fields.

sunnyskies
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can someone please explain to me why

[itex]\epsilon_{ijk}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial A_k}{\partial x_j} = 0[/itex]

where A is a constant vector field.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The double differentiation w.r.t the coordinates is symmetric: $$\frac{\partial}{\partial x_j}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}=\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_j}$$

On the other hand, the Levi-Civita tensor is anti-symmetric on i,j. Interchange these indices and you therefore get: $$\epsilon_{ijk}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_j}=-\epsilon_{jik}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_j}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}=-\epsilon_{ijk}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_j}$$
where in the second equality we have renamed the dummy indices (they are summed over) i to j and j to i.
So we get that something is equal to minus itself, and thus is zero.
 
Makes perfect sense, thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K