Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Question on derivatives of Hermitian conjugate scalar fields

  1. Dec 20, 2013 #1
    Hi,

    I know this question may seem a little trivial, but is there any real difference between

    [itex]\left (\partial_{\mu} \phi \right)^{\dagger}[/itex] and [itex]\partial_{\mu} \phi^{\dagger}[/itex]

    and if so, could someone provide an explanation?

    Many thanks.

    (Sorry if this isn't quite in the right section, this is my first ever post).
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 20, 2013 #2

    strangerep

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Assuming that by ##\partial_\mu##, you mean a partial derivative wrt a real parameter, then no.
     
  4. Dec 20, 2013 #3
    Yes, sorry I meant wrt [itex] x^{\mu}[/itex], where [itex] x^{\mu}[/itex] is the usual space-time coordinate 4-vector, such that [itex] \partial_{\mu}\equiv\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}}[/itex]

    Is it just convention then to, for example, express the Dirac Lagrangian density as

    [itex] \cal{L}=i\overline{\Psi}\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu} \Psi - i\overline{\left(\partial_{\mu}\Psi\right)}\gamma^{\mu}\Psi-\overline {\Psi}m\Psi [/itex]

    (I've seen it expressed like this in several lecture note PDFs and textbooks that I've read)? Is it written this way just so the notation

    [itex] \frac{i}{2}\overline{\Psi}\gamma^{\mu}\overleftrightarrow{\partial_{\mu}} \Psi = i\overline{\Psi}\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu} \Psi - i\overline{\left(\partial_{\mu}\Psi\right)}\gamma^{\mu}\Psi [/itex]

    makes sense?

    I seem to remember, maybe incorrectly, that it has to be operated on in this fashion so that it preserves the Hermicity of the Lagrangian for Spinor fields [itex] \Psi [/itex] and [itex] \overline{\Psi}[/itex] ?

    Thanks for your time!
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2013
  5. Dec 20, 2013 #4

    strangerep

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    It seems to me that one may understand this by just acting with ##\partial## on everything to its left. The constant ##\gamma^\mu## passes through the derivative. Then revert to conventional right-acting derivative notation, inserting parentheses so as to preserve the meaning of the expression. But in this case, one could move the overbar inside the parentheses, afaict.

    BTW, note also that the overbar typically means a Dirac adjoint, so you've got a ##\gamma^0## floating around in there.

    I was never a fan of the ##\overleftrightarrow{\partial_{\mu}}## notation, and prefer to exhibit the Hermicity explicitly. But one must be conversant with the notation nevertheless, since many textbooks use it.
     
  6. Dec 20, 2013 #5
    Thanks for your help, much appreciated!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Question on derivatives of Hermitian conjugate scalar fields
Loading...