Question on discrete commutation relation in QFT

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the commutation relation in quantum field theory, specifically regarding the Fourier transforms of the field operators. It confirms that the commutation relation $$\left[\tilde{\phi}(\vec{k}),\tilde{\pi}(\vec{k}')\right]=i\delta_{\vec{k},-\vec{k}'}$$ is valid, and both forms of the Kronecker delta can be used interchangeably. Participants emphasize the importance of distinguishing between the position space operators and their Fourier-transformed counterparts to avoid confusion. Overall, the derivation of the commutator is affirmed, reinforcing the relationship between the operators in different representations. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for clarity in quantum field theory discussions.
user1139
Messages
71
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
The statement is in title
Relevant Equations
The equations are given below
Given the commutation relation

$$\left[\phi\left(t,\vec{x}\right),\pi\left(t,\vec{x}'\right)\right]=i\delta^{n-1}\left(\vec{x}-\vec{x}'\right)$$

and define the Fourier transform as

$$\tilde{\phi}(t,\vec{k})=\frac{1}{\sqrt{L^{n-1}}}\int_{\,0}^{\,L}\phi(t,\vec{x})e^{-i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{x}}\,\mathrm{d}^{n-1}\vec{x}$$

$$\tilde{\pi}(t,\vec{k})=\frac{1}{\sqrt{L^{n-1}}}\int_{\,0}^{\,L}\pi(t,\vec{x})e^{-i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{x}}\,\mathrm{d}^{n-1}\vec{x}$$

Is it then correct to say the following?

$$\left[\tilde{\phi}(\vec{k}),\tilde{\pi}(\vec{k}')\right]=i\delta_{\vec{k},-\vec{k}'}=i\delta_{-\vec{k},\vec{k}'}$$

i.e. can I use both Kronecker deltas interchangeably?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried to derive the commutator? You also should destinguish the operators ##\phi(t,\vec{x})## from ##\tilde{\phi}(\vec{k})##, because otherwise it leads to confusion. If so, where is your problem. Of course ##\delta_{\vec{k},-\vec{k}'}=\delta_{-\vec{k},\vec{k}'}##.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top