Question on finding work done on charge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the work done to move a charge (q3) from infinity to a specific position in the presence of two other charges (q1 and q2) using Coulomb's law. The original approach correctly utilizes the potential energy formula (q3U) and emphasizes that the work done is path-independent, relying solely on the initial and final positions. A participant questioned the omission of the y-components of the forces acting on q3, proposing an alternative method involving sine terms. However, the consensus confirms that integrating the y-component of the electric force yields the same result as the original method, validating its correctness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law
  • Electrostatic Potential Energy
  • Vector Components in Physics
  • Integration Techniques in Calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential from point charges using kq/r.
  • Learn about path independence in conservative force fields.
  • Explore the application of the Pythagorean theorem in vector analysis.
  • Investigate the implications of static electric fields on work and energy calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, educators teaching electric force concepts, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques in physics problems.

RoboNerd
Messages
410
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement




page1.jpg
page2.jpg

Homework Equations



coulomb's law

The Attempt at a Solution



Hi everyone. I understand their approach with the integration to find the amount of work that "a person" would have to do to bring the charge q3 from infinity to its current position.

I understand that the force that this person would have to do is the opposite of the coulombic forces between the q3 and q1 and 2.

My question: why did they not account for the y-components of the coulombic forces between q1 and 2 to a3? The x-components of the two forces would cancel, so the only coulombic forces acting on q3 would be the y-components.

Thus I did exactly what they did, but I added a sine term to account for the y-component and then re-wrote the sine in terms of the vertical distance and "s/2" with pythagorean theorem and then did the integration.

Could anyone please weight in on why their approach is legit and they did not do what I planned to do with the sine term?

Thank you very much in advance.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you correctly do the integration of the y component of the electric force you get the same result.
The solution shown uses the potential to get the potential energy of q3, which is q3U. The potential of a point charge is kq/r where r is the distance from the charge. The potential function is scalar and additive, so the net potential at a point is the sum of the potentials from all charges.
 
I think what is needed to be emphasized is that the work is independent of the path that the q3 follows as is brought from the infinite to the desired place, it depends only on the end points of the path (one point at infinite and one point at the third vertex of the triangle). This holds only if the field is static so that ##\nabla \times E=0##, ##E=\nabla\phi## where ##\phi## is the electrostatic potential (scalar).
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K