Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Question on page 7 Flander's book on differential forms

  1. Jan 21, 2010 #1
    On page 7 it gives two conditions for a linear function on the space of p-vectors built from a linear function on the underlying L space. I do not understand! Does anybody ?
    Then it continues by saying that the two properties are an axiomatic characterization on the space of p-vectors. So, if I understand correctly, the two properties above for linear functions are true iff the axioms for the p-space on page 5-6 are true? Correct? There's no proof. Does anybody know where I can find it?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 22, 2010 #2
    The p-vectors form a vector space and satisfy - by definition - certain algebaic properties. These are tersely listed on page 6 - properties (i),(ii), and (iii).

    These three properties allow one to characterize linear functions on this vector space in terms of the components of the p-vector. On page 7 he is saying - a linear map on the space of p vectors is a multilinear map on the product space, VxV....V ( p times)
    that is also alternating. This you can just prove by calculation.

    For instance, take the case of 2 vectors.

    Keep in mind that f(as^t + bu^w) = af(s^t) + bf(u^w) because f is linear

    f(u^w) = f(-w^u) because u^w = - w^u by (iii)
    = -f(w^u) because f is linear. So f viewed as a function,g, of the product space VxV satisfies the relation g(v,w) = -g(w,v) i.e. g is alternating.

    f(u^ax + by) = f(u^ax + u^by) = f(au^x + bu^y) by (i) and (iii)
    = af(u^x) + bf(u^y) because f is linear. Thus g(u,ax+by) = ag(u,x) + bg(u,y) i.e. g is linear in the second variable. The exact same argument shows that g is also linear in the first variable. Thus g is multilinear.
  4. Jan 22, 2010 #3
    Thanks. What about the axiomatic characterization?
  5. Jan 22, 2010 #4
    Well if you start with a multilinear alternating function then it determines a linear function on p-vectors. So there is a 1-1 correspondence. This means that you can take multilinear and alternating as axioms.
  6. Jan 27, 2010 #5
    Just to comment that this turning of multilinear maps in one space into linear maps
    looks like a tensor product of vector spaces.
  7. Jan 27, 2010 #6
    The tensor product may be defined exactly in this way.
  8. Jan 28, 2010 #7
    Actually, what Flanders seems to say is that that property of f and g can be used as characterization of p-spaces, that is, for all and only p-spaces f and g are related has he says. Am I right? If so, how come?
  9. Jan 28, 2010 #8
    The relation of f and g is called a universal a mapping property.

    The p spaces are uniquely determined through the conversion of a multi-linear map on a vector space into a linear map on another vector space.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Question on page 7 Flander's book on differential forms
  1. Differential forms (Replies: 8)