Question on sequence and limits.

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Sequence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around limits of sequences, particularly focusing on proving the existence of limits and establishing bounds for specific sequences. The original poster presents a sequence defined as the sum of reciprocals and seeks to demonstrate that its limit is less than 1 but greater than 1/2. Additional questions about limits and convergence are also raised, indicating a broader inquiry into sequence behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods to establish bounds for the limit of the sequence, including comparing it to simpler sequences. Questions arise about the validity of certain inequalities and the application of known theorems, such as Bernoulli's inequality, to prove monotonicity of sequences.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the original poster's reasoning and to provide alternative approaches to the problems presented. Some participants offer insights into the structure of the sequences and suggest methods for proving convergence, while others express uncertainty about the original poster's conclusions. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations and methods without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the homework context, including the requirement to avoid certain theorems or methods, which influences the approaches discussed. The original poster's questions reflect a need for deeper understanding of limits and convergence in sequences.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
prove that the limit of the sequence an=1/n+1/(n+1)+...+1/2n
exists. show that the limit is less than 1 but not less than 1/2.

the first part of the question i did already, I am not sure about the second part of the question if i did properly.

n(1/n+...+1/2n)>=an=1/n+...+1/2n>=1/n^2+...+1/2n^2
because the limit exists, for every n>N(e) (for every e>0) |a-an|<e
and thus, a-e<an<a+e
if we let e=1/2 then a+e<=1.5 and thus a<=1.
a-1/2>=1/n^2+...+1/2n^2-1/2>0
thus a>1/2.

is this correct?

thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't follow you.

You should do this by trying to find sequences whose limits are 1 or 1/2 but that are respectively greater than or less than this sequence. What if every term in the sum were 1/n? What if every term in the sum were 1/2n?
 
thanks for the help, i got it now.
i have another two questions about limits:
1)find: lim(1/(1*2*3)+1/(2*3*4)+...+1/n(n+1)(n+2)) as n appraoches infinity.
2)if a0+a1+...+ap=0, prove that [tex]lim(a_0\sqrt n+a_1\sqrt (n+1)+...a_p\sqrt (n+p))=0[/tex] as n appraoches infinity.
for the second question i have the hint to take out sqrt(n) out as a factor which i did, but i got this:
lim(sqrt(n))*lim(a0+a1sqrt(1+1/n)+...+ap(sqrt(1+p/n)) the first limit diverges to infinity, and the second converges to zero, but as i know infinity times 0 is intermediate. (if it were [tex]n^{1/n}[/tex] then it would converge to 1).
for the first question i tried to use this identity, 1/k(k+1)(k+2)=1/(k+2)[1/k-1/(k+1)] but didnt succeed here.

thanks in advance.
 
Use the full partial fraction decomposition:

[tex]\frac{1}{k(k+1)(k+2)}=\frac{1}{2k}-\frac{1}{k+1}+\frac{1}{2(k+2)}[/tex]

here is a tool for partial fractions: http://www.hostsrv.com/webmab/app1/MSP/quickmath/02/pageGenerate?site=quickmath&s1=algebra&s2=partial_fractions&s3=basic
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know how you were supposed to do the second one, but one way that works:
The problem is equivalent to the problem of whether [tex]\sqrt{n}-\sqrt{n+1}[/tex] goes to 0. This is because the original sum can be written as a sum of p - 1 constant multiples of these simpler terms. Namely,
[tex]a_0\sqrt {n}+a_1\sqrt {n+1}+...a_p\sqrt {n+p}[/tex]
=
[tex]\sum_{i=0}^{p-1} (\sum_{j=0}^{i}a_j) \cdot (\sqrt{n + i}-\sqrt{n + i+1})[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Since [tex]a_0+a_1+\cdots +a_p=0,[/tex] we have [tex]a_0= -\left( a_1+\cdots +a_p\right) ,[/tex] and hence

[tex]\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} \left( a_0\sqrt{n}+a_1\sqrt{n+1}+\cdots +a_p\sqrt{n+p}\right)[/tex]
[tex]= \lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} \left[ -\left( a_1+\cdots +a_p\right) \sqrt{n}+a_1\sqrt{n+1}+\cdots +a_p\sqrt{n+p}\right][/tex]
[tex]=\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} \left[ a_1\left( \sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n}\right)+ a_2\left( \sqrt{n+2} - \sqrt{n}\right) + \cdots + a_p\left( \sqrt{n+p} - \sqrt{n}\right) \right][/tex]
[tex]=\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} \left( \frac{a_1}{\sqrt{n+1} + \sqrt{n}}+ \frac{2a_2}{\sqrt{n+2} + \sqrt{n}}+ \cdots + \frac{pa_p}{\sqrt{n+p} + \sqrt{n}} \right) =0[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Very nice! :approve:
 
****, i knew it was simple, anyway here are a couple of more questions:
1)without reference to binomial theorem show that an=(1+1/n)^n is monotone increasing and bn=(1+1/n)^(n+1) is monotone decreasing.
(hint: use bernouli inequality).
well i got these inequalities but i don't know how to infer from them that an+1>=an.
here are the inequalities (i know you can infer this also from the limit of the sequence):
(1+1/n)^n>=2
(1+1/(n+1))^(n+1)>=2
(1+1/(n+1))^n>=1+n/(n+1)
(1+1/n)^(n+1)>=2+1/n
(1+1/(n+1))^n<=(1+1/(n+1))^(n+1)<=(1+1/n)^(n+1)
what's missing here?
2) if an>0 and lim a_n+1/a_n=L as n appraoches infinity, then lim (a_n)^(1/n)=L
what i did is as follows:
for every n>N(e) (for every e>0) |an+1/an-L|<e, L-e<an+1/an<L+e
if an+1/an<=1 then the sequence decreasing abnd is bounded below by:
L-e, cause an+1>an(L-e)>=L-e thus |an^(1/n)-L|<=|an-L|<e.
if an+1/an>1 then the sequence is increasing and L>=1 thus
an<an+1/(L-e) is bounded above an+1>an(L-e)>L-e thus
|an^(1/n)-L|<=|an-L|<e
what do you think of my appraoch? is it valid?
 
lqg, for the love of god, please use spaces between lines and learn a little latex. It isn't hard, and makes things 100 times easier to read (as well as easier to write).

Anyway, for the first question, the http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/BernoullisInequality.html" can be applied if you divide successive terms. For example:

[tex]\frac{(1+\frac{1}{n})^{n}}{(1+\frac{1}{n-1})^{n-1}}=\left(\frac{ (\frac{n+1}{n}) }{ (\frac{n}{n-1}) }\right)^n (\frac{n}{n-1})=(1-\frac{1}{n^2})^n(\frac{n}{n-1})[/tex]

Then apply the inequality.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
i know little bit latex, but it takes more time to type in latex.
 
  • #11
You should practice making your proofs more readable, I have added modifications to what you wrote in bold to give you an example of how to clarify your statements.

loop quantum gravity said:
2) if an>0 and lim a_n+1/a_n=L as n appraoches infinity, then lim (a_n)^(1/n)=L
what i did is as follows:
If e>0, pick N(e) so that for every n>N(e) |an+1/an-L|<e. Then L-e<an+1/an<L+e for all n>N(e)
if an+1/an<=1 then the sequence decreasing abnd is bounded below by:
L-e, cause an+1>an(L-e)>=L-e
This is a false statement, in order for it to be true you must be certain that an >= 1 for all n>N(e) which is not hypothesized. .

Try this,
You have that for all n > N,

[tex]L-e < \left| \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} \right| < L + e \ \ \ \ \ \ (1)[/tex]

for n>N we can write

[tex]|a_n| = \left| \frac{a_n}{a_{n-1}} \right| \cdot \left| \frac{a_{n-1}}{a_{n-2}} \right| \cdots \left| \frac{a_{N+1}}{a_N} \right| \cdot |a_N| \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (2)[/tex]

note that there are n-N fractions so use inequality (1) n-N times.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
i don't see how can i use this?
 
  • #13
Using (1) and (2), we have that

[tex]|a_N|\cdot(L-e)^{n-N} < |a_n| < |a_N|\cdot(L+e)^{n-N} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (3)[/tex]

define [itex]c_1 = |a_N|\cdot(L-e)^{-N}[/itex], and [itex]c_2 = |a_N|\cdot(L+e)^{-N}[/itex]

Then (3) becomes:

[tex]c_1(L-e)^n < |a_n| < c_2(L+e)^n[/tex]

take the n'th root of each side and then take the limit as n goes to infinity. Recall that if a>0 then [itex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a^{\frac{1}{n}} = 1[/itex]
 
Last edited:
  • #14
benorin said:
Since [tex]a_0+a_1+\cdots +a_p=0,[/tex] we have [tex]a_0= -\left( a_1+\cdots +a_p\right) ,[/tex] and hence

[tex]\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} \left( a_0\sqrt{n}+a_1\sqrt{n+1}+\cdots +a_p\sqrt{n+p}\right)[/tex]
[tex]= \lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} \left[ -\left( a_1+\cdots +a_p\right) \sqrt{n}+a_1\sqrt{n+1}+\cdots +a_p\sqrt{n+p}\right][/tex]
[tex]=\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} \left[ a_1\left( \sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n}\right)+ a_2\left( \sqrt{n+2} - \sqrt{n}\right) + \cdots + a_p\left( \sqrt{n+p} - \sqrt{n}\right) \right][/tex]
[tex]=\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} \left( \frac{a_1}{\sqrt{n+1} + \sqrt{n}}+ \frac{2a_2}{\sqrt{n+2} + \sqrt{n}}+ \cdots + \frac{pa_p}{\sqrt{n+p} + \sqrt{n}} \right) =0[/tex]
Well, it's roughly the same idea as what I said--a sum of constant multiples of p-1 sequences of the form
[tex]\sqrt{n + k} - \sqrt{n}[/tex]
 
  • #15
StatusX said:
lqg, for the love of god, please use spaces between lines and learn a little latex. It isn't hard, and makes things 100 times easier to read (as well as easier to write).

Anyway, for the first question, the http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/BernoullisInequality.html" can be applied if you divide successive terms. For example:

[tex]\frac{(1+\frac{1}{n})^{n}}{(1+\frac{1}{n-1})^{n-1}}=\left(\frac{ (\frac{n+1}{n}) }{ (\frac{n}{n-1}) }\right)^n (\frac{n}{n-1})=(1-\frac{1}{n^2})^n(\frac{n}{n-1})[/tex]

Then apply the inequality.
now about this question i have a follow up question:
use the above to prove that:
(n/e)^n<n!<e(n+1)(n/e)^n
i tried to rearrange it this way:
(1/e)^n<n!/n^n<e(n+1)(1/e)^n
e= lim (1+n)^(1/n)
e(n+1)=(1+n)^(1/n+1)
but i didnt succeed in using the first question you helped me on status.
can someone hekp on here?

thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
Isn't this so much nicer:

loop quantum gravity said:
now about this question i have a follow up question:
use the above to prove that:

[tex]\left(\frac{n}{e}\right)^n<n!< e (n+1)\left(\frac{n}{e}\right)^n[/tex]

i tried to rearrange it this way:

[tex]\left(\frac{1}{e}\right)^n<\frac{n!}{n^n}<e(n+1)\left(\frac{1}{e}\right)^n[/tex]

[tex]e= \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} (1+n)^{1/n}[/tex]

[tex]e(n+1)=(1+n)^{1/n+1}[/tex]

but i didnt succeed in using the first question you helped me on status.
can someone hekp on here?

thanks in advance.

That took me less than 5 minutes. Please start writing things this way. You'll get used to it in no time, and it makes our lives much easier. After all, we're helping you, so the least you can do is make it easier for us to do this.

As far as your question, the last equation above is wrong, and needs to be rewritten using limits. Be careful about mixing up n in the inequality and n in the limit defining e, and you should use two different variables for these.

The best way to solve this problem is probably to take the logs of each side, and then use an integral to approximate [itex]\ln n! = \sum_k \ln k[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • #17
it's in a chapter before integral is being covered, so I am guessing there's a solution without using integrals.
 
  • #18
exponential-factorial inequality proof

loop quantum gravity said:
now about this question i have a follow up question:
use the above to prove that:

[tex]\left(\frac{n}{e}\right)^n< n! < e(n+1)\left(\frac{n}{e}\right)^n[/tex]

[tex]\vdots[/tex]​

but i didnt succeed in using the first question you helped me on status.
can someone hekp on here?

thanks in advance.

this follows from the previous problem: where it was proved that if

[tex]a_n=\left( 1+\frac{1}{n}\right) ^{n}, \, \, \, b_n=\left( 1+\frac{1}{n}\right) ^{n+1}[/tex]​

then [tex]a_n[/tex] and [tex]b_n[/tex] are monotone increasing and decreasing sequences, respectfully. Also note that [tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}a_n=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}b_n=e[/tex] and so that for every [tex]n\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}[/tex] we have,

[tex]a_n\leq e \leq b_n[/tex]​

that is

[tex]\left( 1+\frac{1}{n}\right) ^{n}\leq e \leq \left( 1+\frac{1}{n}\right) ^{n+1}[/tex]​

now take the product of each term in this inequality from n=1 to k, i.e.

[tex]\prod_{n=1}^{k} \left( 1+\frac{1}{n}\right) ^{n}\leq e^{k} \leq \prod_{n=1}^{k}\left( 1+\frac{1}{n}\right) ^{n+1}[/tex]​

rewrite this as

[tex]\prod_{n=1}^{k} \left( \frac{n+1}{n}\right) ^{n}\leq e^{k} \leq \prod_{n=1}^{k}\left( \frac{n+1}{n}\right) ^{n+1}[/tex]​

expand it out

[tex]\frac{2^1\cdot 3^2\cdot 4^3 \cdots (k+1)^{k}}{1^1\cdot 2^2\cdot 3^3 \cdots k^{k}}\leq e^{k} \leq \frac{2^2\cdot 3^3\cdot 4^4 \cdots (k+1)^{k+1}}{1^2\cdot 2^3\cdot 3^4 \cdots k^{k+1}}[/tex]​

notice the products telescope, and cancellation gives

[tex]\frac{(k+1)^{k}}{k!}\leq e^{k} \leq \frac{(k+1)^{k+1}}{k!}[/tex]​

you can get it from here...
 
  • #19
after rearranging the last equation, i get:
[tex]\frac{(k+1)^k}{e^k}<=k!<=\frac{(k+1)^{k+1}}{e^k}[/tex]
if i put k=n-1 i still don't get the desired inequality.
 
  • #20
this gives tighter bounds...

loop quantum gravity said:
after rearranging the last equation, i get:

[tex]\frac{(k+1)^k}{e^k}\leq k!\leq \frac{(k+1)^{k+1}}{e^k}[/tex]​

if i put k=n-1 i still don't get the desired inequality.

It's there: no worries... in fact, this gives tighter bounds. Here, put k=n-1 to get

[tex]\frac{n^{n-1}}{e^{n-1}}\leq (n-1)!\leq\frac{n^{n}}{e^{n-1}}[/tex]​

now multiply by n to get

[tex]\frac{n^{n}}{e^{n-1}}\leq n!\leq\frac{n^{n+1}}{e^{n-1}}[/tex]​

rewrite this as

[tex]e\left( \frac{n}{e}\right) ^{n}\leq n!\leq en\left( \frac{n}{e}\right) ^{n}[/tex]​

now since [tex]1<e[/tex] and since [tex]n<n+1[/tex] we have


[tex]\left( \frac{n}{e}\right) ^{n} < e\left( \frac{n}{e}\right) ^{n}\leq n!\leq en\left( \frac{n}{e}\right) ^{n}< e(n+1)\left( \frac{n}{e}\right) ^{n}[/tex]​

-Ben
 
  • #21
yes, i figured it out already.
thanks for help ben.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K