Question on Transfer Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter doublemint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences in Nyquist and Bode plots derived from the same closed-loop transfer function (TF) G' = G/(1 + GH), where G = 1/s and H = 1/(s + 1). The user initially simplified the transfer function by hand and plotted it in Excel, resulting in a crescent-shaped graph, while Mathematica produced a different graph without simplification. The key takeaway is that while the mathematical expressions for G' are equivalent, the graphical representations can differ due to potential errors in the plotting process or simplification steps.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transfer functions in control systems
  • Familiarity with Nyquist and Bode plot concepts
  • Basic knowledge of MATLAB or Mathematica for plotting
  • Experience with complex numbers and their representation in the complex plane
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive and plot transfer functions using MATLAB
  • Study the stability criteria using Nyquist plots in control theory
  • Explore the differences between Bode and Nyquist plots in detail
  • Practice plotting complex functions in Mathematica to verify results
USEFUL FOR

Control engineers, students studying control systems, and anyone interested in understanding the graphical representation of transfer functions and their implications for system stability.

doublemint
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Just a simple question on Transfer Functions.

If I was give a open loop TF, G, and a feedback loop H, then the closed loop TF is G'=\frac{G}{1+GH}.

So my first attempt was to simplify the G' by hand and then plot it in excel which produced a crescent shaped moon.
By simplification, I mean this:
Let G=1/s and H=1/(s+1)
G'=\frac{G}{1+GH}=\frac{1/s}{1+\frac{1}{s}+\frac{1}{s+1}}=\frac{s+1}{s(s+1)+1}
But, then I go to mathematica and enter the G' without simplification (just \frac{G}{1+GH})and it gave me a totally different graph.

Even though the the G' is the same (mathematically) in both cases, why does the Nyquist (and thus Bode) plots are different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
doublemint said:
By simplification, I mean this:
Let G=1/s and H=1/(s+1)
G'=\frac{G}{1+GH}=\frac{1/s}{1+\frac{1}{s}+\frac{1}{s+1}}=\frac{s+1}{s(s+1)+1}

That looks fine except the second step looks to be a typo with the second '+' in the denominator meant to be multiplication.

Even though the the G' is the same (mathematically) in both cases, why does the Nyquist (and thus Bode) plots are different?

What kind of graphs did you do? Obviously they should be the same whether you use excel or mathematica.

Bode plots have increasing frequency on the horizontal axis and present the gain and phase of a complex quantity as w varies in a typical graph form. A nyquist plot, on the other hand, is essentially a polar plot that traces the value of a complex quantity in the complex plane as w varies.

Usually the nyquist plot is done on the loop gain GH to find out if there are poles in the right half plane of the overall function G/(1+GH). You can get similar information from a bode plot of GH too but, as mentioned, the bode plot is like a standard graph whereas the nyquist plot is a polar plot.

You can think if their similarity like this: a Nyquist plot is looking to see if a polar plot of GH encircles the point -1 to determine stability. In a bode plot of GH, the magnitude of GH should be less than 1 when the phase is 180 degrees (pi). The point -1∠0 in the nyquist plot occurs at phase 180 degrees and there will be no encirclements of -1 if |GH| < 1 when the phase is 180 degrees. So you can see the gain/phase conditions on GH in the bode plot are the same as the encirclement of -1 test in the nyquist plot.
 
Last edited:
I did Nyquist.
Yeah you are correct. I just tried the simplified equations I posted and did another graph with functions of more complexity and both Nyquist plots are the same..

I guess I typed something in wrong :(

Thanks for the help though!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K