Question on VO(acac)-piperidine

  • Thread starter Thread starter warenzeichen
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the V=O stretching frequency in VO(acac)-piperidine, which is observed at 957 cm-1, compared to 995 cm-1 in VO(acac)2. The lower frequency in VO(acac)-piperidine is attributed to resonance stabilization involving the nitrogen atom of piperidine forming a bond with vanadium, resulting in a more stable nitrogen cation compared to the carbocation formed in VO(acac)2. This resonance effect weakens the V=O bond, leading to the observed frequency shift of approximately 40 cm-1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of V=O stretching vibrations in coordination compounds
  • Knowledge of resonance structures in chemical bonding
  • Familiarity with IR spectroscopy and its application to metal complexes
  • Basic concepts of cation stability and ligand interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of IR spectroscopy specific to metal complexes
  • Study resonance structures and their impact on bond strength
  • Explore the chemistry of vanadium complexes, particularly VO(acac)2
  • Learn about the synthesis and characterization of piperidine-substituted metal complexes
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, particularly those specializing in coordination chemistry, inorganic chemistry researchers, and students studying IR spectroscopy and resonance in chemical bonding.

warenzeichen
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am curious of the reason why the V=O stretching here has a lower frequency than that in VO(acac)2. Is it related to resonance? I am not sure.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Yeah, you can explain it in terms of resonance.

Basically (ignoring the two existing bonds to vanadium) you have V=O <--> -V-O- where in the latter case, some ligand forms an additional bond to the vanadium atom, creating a cation somewhere else.

In the case of VO(acac)2, an oxygen forms an additional bond, leaving a cation on the carbon it is bonded to. With piperedine, the nitrogen can form a second bond to vanadium, with its lone pair, making the nitrogen a cation.

The nitrogen cation is more stable than the carbocation, so the V-O- resonance form is more stable with piperidine, so the V=O double-bond is weaker, so the V=O stretch has a lower frequency.

(Updated: I did a calculation, it's a pretty small shift, about 20 cm-1? http://i38.tinypic.com/25z5pwg.gif")
 
Last edited by a moderator:
about 40 cm^-1

the V=O stretching vibration for VO(acac)2 at 995cm^-1 and for VO(acac)-piperidine it is at 957cm^-1

I think there should be four bonds except the V=O ? also, one acac is substituted by piperidine, isn't it?

Thanks.
 
warenzeichen said:
about 40 cm^-1

Well, close enough - well within the margin of error. :)

I think there should be four bonds except the V=O ? also, one acac is substituted by piperidine, isn't it?

Well, with VO(acac)2 you'll have four oxygens liganding, but with two bonds which you could view as resonating between the two acetylacetonate oxygen atoms. So, 'half' a bond to each oxygen would really be a better way of thinking of it. (and in the zwitterion-resonance form, you'd have two full bonds to one acac, and a carbocation on the same acac) With VO(acac) you'd replace one acetylacetonate with the piperidine (CH2)5N-.
 
Thanks for your answer.
and finally could you tell me how to calculate it ? It seems that I can not calculate it based on the information I knew in the IR( I don't learn the IR on metal in details... But it looks pretty similar to IR but in more complex way...)
 
warenzeichen said:
about 40 cm^-1

the V=O stretching vibration for VO(acac)2 at 995cm^-1 and for VO(acac)-piperidine it is at 957cm^-1

I think there should be four bonds except the V=O ? also, one acac is substituted by piperidine, isn't it?

Thanks.
Hello there,

The stretching frequency of v(V=O) band is 957 cm^(-1), could you please tell me if it is your experimental value or literature value?

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
931
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K