warenzeichen
- 20
- 0
I am curious of the reason why the V=O stretching here has a lower frequency than that in VO(acac)2. Is it related to resonance? I am not sure.
The discussion centers on the V=O stretching frequency in VO(acac)-piperidine, which is observed at 957 cm-1, compared to 995 cm-1 in VO(acac)2. The lower frequency in VO(acac)-piperidine is attributed to resonance stabilization involving the nitrogen atom of piperidine forming a bond with vanadium, resulting in a more stable nitrogen cation compared to the carbocation formed in VO(acac)2. This resonance effect weakens the V=O bond, leading to the observed frequency shift of approximately 40 cm-1.
PREREQUISITESChemists, particularly those specializing in coordination chemistry, inorganic chemistry researchers, and students studying IR spectroscopy and resonance in chemical bonding.
warenzeichen said:about 40 cm^-1
I think there should be four bonds except the V=O ? also, one acac is substituted by piperidine, isn't it?
Hello there,warenzeichen said:about 40 cm^-1
the V=O stretching vibration for VO(acac)2 at 995cm^-1 and for VO(acac)-piperidine it is at 957cm^-1
I think there should be four bonds except the V=O ? also, one acac is substituted by piperidine, isn't it?
Thanks.