Question;weights,faulty balance

  • Thread starter Thread starter konichiwa2x
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balance
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a false balance where a body weighs differently depending on which pan it is placed in. The original poster seeks to determine the true weight of the body based on the weights indicated by the balance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the balance being false and explore the relationships between the masses involved. There are attempts to derive equations based on the weights observed in each pan and the conditions of the balance.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, proposing equations and questioning assumptions about the balance's behavior. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationships between the masses, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct interpretation or solution.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the balance being false, which complicates the assumptions about the masses of the pans. The original poster and others are working through the implications of this and how it affects their calculations.

konichiwa2x
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Hi,

A body weighs 8gm when placed in one pan and 18gm when placed on the other pan of a false balkance. If the beam is horizontal when both the pans are empty, then what is the true weight of the body?

How do I do this? Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
konichiwa2x said:
Hi,

A body weighs 8gm when placed in one pan and 18gm when placed on the other pan of a false balkance. If the beam is horizontal when both the pans are empty, then what is the true weight of the body?

How do I do this? Please help.
Let the pans have mass m1 and m2. Let the body have a mass of x.

When the body is placed on pan1 one has to add 8 g. to pan 2 to balance it. When the body is placed on pan2 one has to add 18 g. to pan 1 to balance it.

I would suggest that you write out the relationship between m1, m2, x and the added masses in each weighing and solve. You won't solve for m1 and m2 but you should be able to solve for m1-m2 and x.

AM
 
If the beam is horizontal when both the pans are empty, doesn't that mean both the pans have equal mass?

Anway, is this what you meant?
m1 = km2
m1 + x = m2 + 8
m2 + 18 = m2 + x


solving, x = 13? Is this correct?

My book says the correct answer is 12gm..
 
konichiwa2x said:
If the beam is horizontal when both the pans are empty, doesn't that mean both the pans have equal mass?
Not quite, because it is a false balance. But I think I may have misled you a little on my first answer.

A balance works by equalizing torque. You can say that m1r1 = m2r2 where r1 and r2 are the distances of m1 and m2 from the fulcrum. If r1 and r2 are equal, the balance balances only if m1 = m2. We are told that this is not the case here. So all we can say is that:

m1r1 = m2r2

Therefore,

(m1 + x)r1 = (m2 + 8)r2

(m1 + 18)r1 = (m2 + x)r2

Work that out for x. The answer in the book is correct.

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arnab
ok thanks a lot!:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K