Question with slope, masses, pulley

  • Thread starter Thread starter mystmyst
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley Slope
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a system of masses connected by a pulley, with one mass on a slope and friction considerations. The original poster seeks to derive an expression for the acceleration of the system under specific conditions, particularly when there is no relative motion between two masses on the slope.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of no relative motion between the masses, questioning whether they can have different accelerations. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between the masses and the forces acting on them, including the role of friction.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering clarifications about the relationships between the masses and their accelerations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the forces acting on the system, and there is an exploration of how to account for these forces in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the effects of friction and the need to consider multiple forces acting on the masses, as well as the implications of treating certain masses as combined due to their interactions.

mystmyst
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/4452/mechanicsdiagram2.png

Homework Statement

There is no friction between mass c and the slope. The pulley and rope have no mass. The coefficient of friction between the two masses on the slope is \mu_1

Get an expression for the acceleration of the system of masses when there is no relative motion between the two masses on the slope.

The Attempt at a Solution



There is something I don't get: If there is not relative motion between the two masses on the slope, then each mass has a different acceleration. The question makes it seem that I should still find a total acceleration of the entire system but I don't think that is possible.

Also, even though b and c have different accelerations, c and d still have the same acceleration, correct?

So, the way I would do it is find the acceleration for b, and find the acceleration for c and d. Is that correct or is there really one unifying acceleration?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are very confused here.

Firstly, b and c, if there is no relative motion between them, they must have the same velocity and acceleration.

Now, they can have the same acceleration but different force acting on them.
F = ma, they have different masses, hence they have different magnitude of force acting on them. This is because you need more force to accelerate something that is heavier (to be precise, more inertia).

Also, the acceleration of d is the same as acceleration of b and c. d cannot accelerate more than b and c since the rope cannot stretch, or break for all that matter.
Acceleration of d cannot be less that b and c, if not the string will not be taut.

delzac
 
Delzac said:
I think you are very confused here.

Firstly, b and c, if there is no relative motion between them, they must have the same velocity and acceleration.

ooo. I thought relative motion means they are moving together at the same velocity and acceleration. So if there is no relative motion they are moving at different velocities and different accelerations.

Thanks for clearing that up.
 
so basically the only force acting on the system is the weight from mass d. so:

m_dg = (b+c+d)a

correct?

and if there was friction between the mass and the slope it would be:

m_dg - f_k = (b+c+d)a
 
You have to take into account that the the force is not one sided, meaing, b and c also provides a force in the opposite direction.

The difference in the 2 forces will determine if the mass will move in either direction.
 
o you i forgot about the mg\cos \alpha and mg\sin \alpha stuff...
thanks
 
When I am calculating the net force, do I also include the force from the small mass (with mass b):

bg\sin \alpha

or I don't since the friction cancels it out?

as in either:

dg - cg\sin \alpha = (b+c+d)a

or

dg - cg\sin \alpha - bg\sin \alpha= (b+c+d)a
 
Well, you will have to take into account both mass, since both b and c is tugging on the rope. You can imagine that there are glued together, so their mass will have to add up.
 
Delzac said:
Well, you will have to take into account both mass, since both b and c is tugging on the rope. You can imagine that there are glued together, so their mass will have to add up.


I know I take their mass into account. that's why i have (b+c+d)a

but my question is referring to the net force. Do I take into account the force from the smaller mass or since the friction cancels it out (which is why it is not moving) I only take into account the large mass.
 
  • #10
Like i said, b and c is as good as glued together, meaning you should treat them as one object.
 
  • #11
gotcha!

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
4K