I Questions about Hawking radiation and extremal black holes...?

Click For Summary
Extremal black holes, including rotating Kerr and Reissner-Nordström types, theoretically avoid Hawking radiation due to a Hawking temperature of 0K, raising questions about their physical existence and potential violation of the third law of thermodynamics. The discussion explores whether nearly-extremal black holes could evade evaporation or if they would still emit some Hawking radiation, leading to inevitable evaporation. Current understanding suggests that non-extremal black holes will always emit Hawking radiation due to their non-zero temperature. The possibility of black holes avoiding evaporation remains an open research area, particularly in contexts like Anti-de Sitter (AdS) spaces, where large black holes may not evaporate due to specific boundary conditions. The feasibility of extremal black holes and their behavior in de Sitter (dS) spacetimes is also questioned, indicating a complex relationship with thermodynamic laws.
Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
Are extremal black holes thermodynamically impossible for having a 0 Hawking temperature?
I'm studying if there is some way to avoid black hole evaporation, even if it requires a very special set up of conditions...

Theoretically, extremal black holes (both for rotating Kerr and Reissner-Nordström ones) would avoid evaporation as they would not emit Hawking radiation. Since perfectly extremal black holes would have a Hawking temperature of 0K, this presumably would violate the 3rd law of thermodynamics.

Then, are extremal black holes physically impossible?

Would nearly-extremal black holes avoid somehow evaporation? Or would they emit a small amount of Hawking radiation that would make them evaporate inevitably?

Can there be any way in which black holes avoid being evaporated? Or is it utterly inevitable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suekdccia said:
Can there be any way in which black holes avoid being evaporated? Or is it utterly inevitable?
Since we don't even have a full theory of black hole evaporation (all we have are approximate models that might or might not be correct), and since we have no evidence about it and aren't likely to get any any time soon, this question is not answerable. The best we can say is that this is still an open area of research.
 
Are you specifically interested in black holes that don't evaporate, or black holes that don't emit any Hawking radiation? If it's the former then you can just put the black hole in AdS. If it's a large black hole (i.e. above the typical AdS length scale) then it won't evaporate because of the reflecting boundary conditions at infinity. The black hole will reach thermal equilibrium with the bath of Hawking radiation.

A non-extremal black hole will always emit Hawking radiation though, because of the non-zero temperature.
 
OlderWannabeNewton said:
A non-extremal black hole will always emit Hawking radiation though, because of the non-zero temperature.
I see. And would extremal black holes be impossible for their 0K temperature?

Also, would the AdS scenario that you described also work for dS spacetimes (which our universe is approaching into)?
 
Last edited:
Both classical and semiclassical gravity predict that they are impossible by the 3rd law of black hole thermodynamics.
 
In Birkhoff’s theorem, doesn’t assuming we can use r (defined as circumference divided by ## 2 \pi ## for any given sphere) as a coordinate across the spacetime implicitly assume that the spheres must always be getting bigger in some specific direction? Is there a version of the proof that doesn’t have this limitation? I’m thinking about if we made a similar move on 2-dimensional manifolds that ought to exhibit infinite order rotational symmetry. A cylinder would clearly fit, but if we...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K