Questions about the "weak link" of Josephson junction

  • Thread starter Thread starter zhanhai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Junction Link
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the concept of "weak links" in Josephson junctions, specifically addressing the role of insulators and gaps. A weak link is defined as a region where superconducting current is compromised, allowing Cooper pairs to tunnel through. The thickness of this weak link is critical, with an optimal range around 10 angstroms, though the upper limit varies based on material properties. Reducing the width or diameter of the superconductor can also create a weak link.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of superconductivity and Cooper pairs
  • Familiarity with Josephson junctions and their components
  • Knowledge of material properties affecting tunneling currents
  • Basic concepts of quantum tunneling in superconductors
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of different materials used in Josephson junctions
  • Explore the implications of varying thickness in weak links on superconducting performance
  • Study the effects of reducing the width or diameter of superconductors
  • Learn about the Josephson effect and its applications in quantum computing
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and researchers in superconductivity and quantum computing will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on the design and optimization of Josephson junctions.

zhanhai
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
1.
It seems that in some Josephson junctions the insulator part is replaced by a gap, as is the so-called mesa. Is it true?

2.
What does "weak link" exactly means? Somewhere it is said that the connection part is of a thickness of about 10 angstroms. What is the upper limit of the thickness?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. A gap is an insulator, isn't it?
2. A weak link is a region of the circuit where superconducting current is compromised but not eliminated--Cooper pairs can tunnel through it. The insulator and gap that you mentioned in part 1 are weak links (assuming they're thin enough). Instead of an insulator, one can reduce the width or diameter of the superconductor to accomplish the same thing.

The limit of thickness depends somewhat on the materials. You don't want tunneling to become unlikely enough that the tunneling current (and, therefore, the Josephson effect) disappear.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K