Questions on Similar matrices [ All of same type ]

  • Thread starter Thread starter WiFO215
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Type
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the topic of similar matrices in linear algebra, specifically focusing on proving the similarity of certain matrices and exploring the implications of linear operators defined by these matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of similar matrices and the need for a change of basis matrix. There are attempts to relate the similarity of matrices to linear operators and their representations in different bases.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between matrices and linear maps, while others are exploring the implications of the definitions and theorems related to linear algebra. There is an ongoing exploration of how to approach the proofs required in the homework statement.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the distinction between proving the existence of an invertible operator versus an invertible matrix, highlighting the nuances in the problem statement. There are also references to specific linear algebra concepts such as eigenvalues and canonical forms, indicating varying levels of familiarity with the material.

WiFO215
Messages
417
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



1. Let [tex]\theta[/tex] be a real number. Prove that the following two matrices are similar over the field of complex numbers:

[tex]\left [\stackrel{cos \theta}{sin \theta} \stackrel{-sin \theta}{cos \theta} \right][/tex] and [tex]\left [\stackrel{ e^{i \theta} }{0} \stackrel{0}{e^ {-i \theta}} \right][/tex]

2. Let W be the space of all nx1 column matrices over R. If A is an nxn matrix over R, then A defines a linear operator La on W through left multiplication : La (X) = AX. Prove that every linear operator on W is left multiplication by some matrix A.
Now, if T,S be operators such that Tn = Sn = 0 but Tn-1 [tex]\neq[/tex] 0, Sn-1 [tex]\neq[/tex] 0 . Prove that T and S both have the same matrix A for some basis B for T and B' for S.
Similarly show that if M and N are nxn matrices such that Mn = Nn = 0 but Mn-1 = Nn-1 [tex]\neq[/tex] 0, then M and N are similar.

The Attempt at a Solution


Sum number 1: I'm not sure how to start this.

Sum number 2: The first part is okay. I can always find/make some matrix A such that the column space of A is the range of La.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For (1), what's the definition of similar matrices? It involves finding a third matrix, called a change of basis matrix, right? Try writing down the definition and plugging in what you have. For 2x2 matrices you should be able to solve this by brute force.
 
Note that the second and third parts of question 2 are essentially asking the same thing. Two matrices are similar precisely when they represent the same linear map with respect to two choices of basis.

How to prove question 2? It depends on what linear algebra you have covered so far. Do you know about eigenvalues? Do you know about any canonical forms, particularly the Jordan normal form?
 
I solved for 1 by myself. Instead of doing what you said, I instead just used the fact that if both the matrices are similar, I can find some operator T such that if the first matrix is the matrix of T in some basis (which I am free to choose), then the second matrix will be the matrix of T in some other basis {p1, p2}. Then I just equated the two. Point is, if they are similar, the equation will yield such a basis, and it did. Piece of cake. No brute force. :)
 
jbunniii said:
How to prove question 2? It depends on what linear algebra you have covered so far. Do you know about eigenvalues? Do you know about any canonical forms, particularly the Jordan normal form?

Nope.
 
jbunniii said:
Note that the second and third parts of question 2 are essentially asking the same thing. Two matrices are similar precisely when they represent the same linear map with respect to two choices of basis.

Actually, part 2.1 of my question asks to prove that there exists an invertible OPERATOR U such that T = USU-1.
Part 2.2 asks me to show that there exists an invertible MATRIX U such that M = UNU-1

Isn't there a difference? Part 1 shows that two totally different operators can have the same matrix representing them in two different bases.

Part 2 asks to show that 1 operator can have 2 different matrices in different bases.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K