Quick and Easy Set Questions: Understanding the Concept of Elements in Math

  • Thread starter Thread starter gflores
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
gflores
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Need some help on some of these problems. Thanks in advanced.

Ø
E = is an element of...

1. Ø E {{Ø}1,2}
False? I'm a little confused. Is Ø on the left side a set? So, can it be equivalently written as {Ø}? If so, then it can't be an element of something, since it's actually a set, or in this case a subset.
2. {2} E {1,2,3}
Confused again here with the 2 being in braces, does it mean it's a set and therefore can't be an element of something? False?
3. Ø = {Ø}
No idea here. I'm guessing true.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks again.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why can't a set be an element of another set?

2) is indeed false, but not for the reason you gave. {2} is not an element of {1,2,3} (if it were, {2} would be equal to 1, 2, or 3. A set equal to a natural number? Surely a contradiction). But {2} IS an element of {1,{2},3}.

{Ø} is a set of sets, while Ø itself is "just" a set. {Ø} has one member, but Ø has zero members.

An analogy: imagine that sets are "baskets". Imagine a really large basket, in which you could put other baskets (these smaller baskets may or may not contain other things). Then you have a "set" which holds other "sets".
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top