Quick brainteaser - Unknown objects and liquid volume/height

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rwooduk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Liquid
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a brain teaser involving the identification of objects in sealed boxes by measuring the height of water when poured into them. Participants explore the implications of the setup, including the nature of the objects and the behavior of water in relation to different shapes and configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion regarding the problem statement, particularly about the number of objects and the mechanics of water interaction with the beaker.
  • Questions arise about whether water enters the beaker and the timing of water flow in relation to the objects.
  • There is a suggestion that the behavior of the water level could indicate the size and shape of the objects, with larger objects causing a quicker rise in water level.
  • One participant proposes quantifying the volume unoccupied by the objects to analyze how fast the water level rises, noting potential complications with floating objects.
  • Concerns are raised about the presence of floating objects affecting the water level measurements and the transition phases during filling.
  • Some participants seek clarification on the meaning of "sealed boxes" and the overall purpose of the exercise, questioning its educational value.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not agree on the clarity of the problem statement and the mechanics involved. Multiple competing views on how to approach the problem and the implications of floating versus non-floating objects remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in understanding the problem due to ambiguities in the setup and the definitions of terms used. The discussion reflects a mix of conceptual and practical challenges without a clear resolution.

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
Hi, here's a quick brain teaser, if we have 3 objects in sealed boxes, we know what the objects could be: a solid metal cylinder, a metal sphere, mixed shape beads, a beaker with a metal object in it, a pyramid.

We can pour water into the boxes and measure the relative liquid height between boxes.

joQrMDA.jpg


So how would you determine which object was in each box?

Has anyone done this experiment before?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
rwooduk said:
if we have 3 objects in sealed boxes, we know what the objects could be: a solid metal cylinder, a metal sphere, mixed shape beads, a beaker with a metal object in it, a pyramid.
Hi rwooduk:
I am having some troubles with the brainteasers.
I am having a bit of counting trouble. I count 3 objects in the list, not 3.
I am having a bit of visualization trouble. When the water is poured into the box with the beaker, does the water get into the beaker?
I am having trouble with the sequence of events. Does water come out the bottom as soon as water goes into the top? If not, what is the delay? Is one to consider the changes with respect to time among the various water heights?​

Over all, I don't think I understand the problem statement well enough to know how to think about a solution.

Regards,
Buzz
 
me too have the trouble to understand.
 
What is the meaning of "sealed boxes" if you can pour water in them?
Can you give a ling to the original text of the problem?
 
Apologies for the late reply.

Buzz Bloom said:
Hi rwooduk:
I am having some troubles with the brainteasers.
I am having a bit of counting trouble. I count 3 objects in the list, not 3.
I am having a bit of visualization trouble. When the water is poured into the box with the beaker, does the water get into the beaker?
I am having trouble with the sequence of events. Does water come out the bottom as soon as water goes into the top? If not, what is the delay? Is one to consider the changes with respect to time among the various water heights?​

Over all, I don't think I understand the problem statement

Regards,
Buzz

1. the objects could be any shape, but there is a list of possibilities, the ones given were just a few examples
2. the water goes either outside or inside the beaker, the beaker could be anywhere in the box, under the water inlet or not
3. the tap at the bottom of the box is closed, and the volume of liquid measured changes as you fill the boxes. the water can be emptied at any point by opening the tap at the bottom.
4. Yes, I believe that is the theory, to watch the water level and how it behaves, for example if it rises quickly there is a large object in the box. If it rises slowly, there is a small object, if it doesn't rise at all until a certain point then it is going into a beaker first etc etc

I just wondered if there is a way to quantify this? i.e. knowing the equations for volume of the objects

Other than that I will have to simply have the students watch how the volume level of the water rises.

nasu said:
What is the meaning of "sealed boxes" if you can pour water in them?
Can you give a ling to the original text of the problem?

You can't see inside the boxes, they are metal and just have a water inlet and outlet taps.
Afraid I don't have one, I've been asked to demonstrate this thing and it seems pointless as nothing can be quantified! It's only for first year students, probably just for a bit of fun, but in my first year physics experiments we were doing errors, analysing lasers, magnetic fields etcetc everything was quantified and analysed.

Thanks for the replies.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom
rwooduk said:
I just wondered if there is a way to quantify this?
You can compute the volume unoccupied by the objects for horizontal slices, which tells you how fast the water level rises at the height of each slice.

But there are tricky cases: The entire beaker interior belongs to the slice at the top of the beaker: Big slow down in level rise at this point, easy to spot.

I'm assuming the objects don't float.
 
A.T. said:
You can compute the volume unoccupied by the objects for horizontal slices, which tells you how fast the water level rises at the height of each slice.

But there are tricky cases: The entire beaker interior belongs to the slice at the top of the beaker: Big slow down in level rise at this point, easy to spot.

I'm assuming the objects don't float.

Good idea! Thanks for that.

Unfortunately there are some different sized hollow balls that do float.
 
rwooduk said:
Good idea! Thanks for that.

Unfortunately there are some different sized hollow balls that do float.
While all the objects inside float, the level rises at a constant rate that is equal to the fill rate. The offset between the filled in water volume, and what the level says is determined by the weight of the floating objects.

However there are transition phases at the begin (nor floating yet) and the end (ceiling contact). If you have too many objects, they might not float freely for long.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rwooduk
A.T. said:
While all the objects inside float, the level rises at a constant rate that is equal to the fill rate. The offset between the filled in water volume, and what the level says is determined by the weight of the floating objects.

However there are transition phases at the begin (nor floating yet) and the end (ceiling contact). If you have too many objects, they might not float freely for long.

Great, that really helps! Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
52K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K